Answer:
Affidavit (assuming the exercise has the same question twice).
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests, an affidavit is a sworn statement, made under oath, before the appropiate magistrate or officer. In other words, is a some kind of authorization for certain processes. In this case, the prosecuting attorney is asking for an affidavit in order to support the search warrant.
Answer:
the third variable problem
Explanation:
Third variable: In psychological research, the term third variable is also referred to as the confounding variable and is defined as a factor except for the independent variable in research that may cause an effect to the result.
Third variable problem: The third variable i.e, the confounding variable is responsible for making a mistake in the causal relationship between the other two variables present in an experiment.
In the question above, the given statement combination of factors is known as the third variable problem.
<span>Answer:
The lack of jurisdiction of home country governments over supplier behavior is exemplified by car-telling and black-market.</span>
<u>Answer:</u>
Now and then depicted as a false analogy or a faulty analogy, the week analogy presents a defense by depending too vigorously on superfluous similitudes without recognizing that <em>two ideas, things, or circumstances might be very particular from each other in an increasingly applicable manner. </em>
False Dilemma is a fallacy <em>dependent on an either-or sort of contention.</em>
Two decisions are exhibited, when more may exist, and the case is made that one is false and one is valid or one is worthy and the other isn't. <em>A False analogy is an informal fallacy.</em>
Answer:
Industrial jobs brought rural residents and immigrants to the cities
Explanation:
