Answer: Both revolutions are the result of the struggle for freedom.
Explanation:
Poor population status, the laws of the subject are similarities between the American war for independence and the Syrian civil war. In America, the British forced the population to fight and revolution.
In Syria, Bashar el-Assad, through his bad policies and laws, but the majority of the Syrian people in an awkward position, who rose in despair against the tyranny of the individual. In both cases, the authorities did not take into account the place of the people and their position, which resulted in the uprising.
People, especially the poor were able to start making a living by producing food and selling it off. also meant that the poor were able to have food if they couldn't afford it.
When establishing a goal, it's important to consider all the factors that are listed except D. Self-judgment of performance.
It should be noted that when an individual is in the forethought phase, it's simply a phase where there's no place for judgement
When an individual is establishing a goal, the factors that can be considered include self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and perceived value of goal.
In conclusion, self-judgment of performance isn't among the factors.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/11476873
There are a few ways that this can be done. I will list the ones I know off the top of my head, as this is a broad question. I will be describing this as if the reader is a political scientist so don't take it personally, it's just so you can better understand.
Cherry Picking: Say you want to get a poll. Don't go to an area where there is a majority of the working class. You wan't to go to areas that are high on welfare, stock brokers, corporate etc. You can best find these in big cities like New York, Orlando, so on. That way, when people see the polls, they will look at what are demographic is, giving them the sense that we are popular party.
Fabrication: Don't worry about the legitimacy. Most people just want some sort of facts or explanation, and if we make one up that it is believable for most people, we are good. So long as they don't look at the actual ice caps and the temperature around the world, as far as they know Global Warming is a thing, *cough* I mean, sorry not Global Warming, Climate Change, it's totally different *wink, wink*.
Censorship: So long as no one sees any contradicting evidence to our polls, they are good. Same thing with Climate Change. If however something does come up we need to treat is as if it is absurd. Conspiracy theorist! But even then we need to make sure that it stays away from public eye, and public opinion.
Hope this helps, don't want to keep you waiting much longer.
Answer:
The country's social-welfare structure proved woefully inadequate. And government attempts to address problems through policy proved misguided. A third of Canada's Gross National Income came from exports. Therefore, the country was hit hard by the collapse in international trade.
Explanation:
