Im assuming you have read the book already that its talking about. So what you need to do in the second part is describe how the item affected the character. Like cause and effect. How did the rash effect him? After you do that make sure you say where you got the evidence from. Then the 3rd step explains itself. Write a paragraph on how the items affect their perspective. Hopefully this helps guide you because I dont have the time to read the full book. Just follow those guidelines
This question is missing the excerpt. I've found it online. Since the options are the same, I will omit them:
Read the selection below from "Civil Peace" by Chinua Achebe and answer the question that follows.
"Awrighto. Now make we talk business. We no be bad tief. We no like for make trouble. Trouble done finish. War done finish and all the katakata wey de for inside. No Civil War again. This time na Civil Peace. No be so?"
What is ironic about the lines above?
Answer:
What is ironic about the lines above is:
A. They are being said by a violent thief threatening others with automatic rifles.
Explanation:
The story "Civil Peace" by Chinua Achebe revolves around Jonathan Iwegbu, a resilient and optimistic survivor of the Civil War in Nigeria. <u>The passage we are analyzing here takes place when Jonathan and his family are being robbed. Those lines are said by the leader of the thieves, and they are quite ironic. He claims that the war is in the past, that the violence is finished. However, what he and the other thieves are doing - robbing someone and threatening them with guns - is and act of violence. Even if they do not kill anyone, violence is still intrinsic to their actions</u>. For that reason, we can choose letter A as the best option: They are being said by a violent thief threatening others with automatic rifles.
Sentence fragment:
Enters the lobby eagerly.
Run on sentence:
Theodore walked 10 miles he did not enjoy it.
Hello. You forgot to show the answer options. The options are:
A. an appeal to emotion
B. an appeal to ethics
C. an appeal to logic
D. an appeal to the author’s character
Answer:
C. an appeal to logic
Explanation:
The text presented above shows an appeal to logic as the rhetoric used to demonstrate how censorship can silence the powerless. This is because the narrator states that she describes how a high school class burned books that they believed were inappropriate. These "improper" books portrayed subjects that had a strong social impact and were considered dangerous because of the ideas they emitted. However, they were just books, they could not fight or defend themselves, they were powerless and therefore, it was logical that they were annulled through censorship.
