1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lutik1710 [3]
3 years ago
8

You are a defense attorney who sees a judge in your jurisdiction having dinner with a prosecutor. both are married to other peop

le. you happened to have a case in front of this judge and the prosecutor is your opponent. you consider that you could request the judge to recuse himself from the case, but this may create animosity, and if he refuses, it could be detrimental to your client. alternatively, you could keep quiet and use the information on appeal, but this may mean your client spends years in prison. finally, you could do nothing and hope that the judge is not biased toward the prosecution in his ruling. what would you do?
Social Studies
1 answer:
babunello [35]3 years ago
3 0
In a court of law, bias is not supposed to be present. If they were both married, yet having dinner, they could be friends or the prosecutor is trying to get on the good side of the judge (or they're cheating). If you feel that the judge might not make impartial or fair rulings then it may be best to try to request him to recuse. However, it would do good to have evidence of such belief and not off of suspicion. The main goal of your case is to try to get your client as little time, or no time, in prison, so doing something that may cause prosecution is not favorable. It may also be helpful to look at past cases, or ask people who have worked with the judge before, to see if he has ever seemed prejudiced on any cases. Try to make a choice based on what you believe and feel will have the best outcome. Remember that this case can determine your clients future.
You might be interested in
What is the climate of Cuba?
dexar [7]
Beautiful weather nice and tropical
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Milton Friedman discussed the possibility of setting the marginal social cost of printing one more unit of money to zero, implyi
Ugo [173]

Answer and Explanation:

Phelps criticized Friedman's position, because he said it was totally irrelevant to analyze the tax functions of inflation without assessing product demand, as Friedman suggested in his theory. He stated that this would only be possible if there was a way to predict an optimal rate of inflation in different situations of demand and supply, otherwise, in Phelps' words it would be the same as "Professor Friedman gave us Hamlet without a prince".

Phelps' positioning would be better considered by the RBC model, since this model is based on real and not imaginary facts.

8 0
2 years ago
NEED HELP NEED HELP NEED HELP NEED HELP NEED HELP NEED HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photoshop1234 [79]

Answer:hi

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sectors of an economy are interdependent and are vital in measurement of economy for reason –
svetoff [14.1K]

The sectors of an economy are interdependent and are vital in measurement of economy for reason that includes:

  • they evaluate the PCI
  • they evaluate GDP that equals the sum of value of final goods and services in each sector

<h3>What caused an economic interdependence?</h3>

The creation of economic interdependence was caused by factors such as the  industrialization, economic advancement, labor specialization, regional production etc.

In the modern times, an economic Interdependence also leads to globalization which triggers international relations and an efficient trading system among economies.

Hence, the sectors of an economy are interdependent and are vital in measurement of economy for reason that includes evaluates the PCI and GDP that equals the sum of value of final goods and services in each sector.

Read more about economic interdependence

brainly.com/question/27693450

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
What is the Northern rockies ecosystem protection act
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer: A method of protection.

Explanation: The Northern Rockies Ecosystem Protection Act is a method of protecting the large amount of endangered species, such as grizzly bears and bull trout. It also helps provide jobs, such as restoring old roads.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The trait approach, the behaviorist approach, and the psychoanalytic approach ________
    12·1 answer
  • The Constitutional Convention limited the power of the executive branch by
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a moderate to vigorous sport that a student can participate in at school without teammates?
    14·1 answer
  • What makes a state qualify as a state?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the financial implications of moving into your own place to live and explain how a budget can help a person successfull
    10·1 answer
  • According to 1790 census, where did enslaved people live within the United States?
    13·1 answer
  • Compare follils x and y during tension​
    14·1 answer
  • In paragraph form describe the steps of a preliminary hearing. <br> (write a 1 paragraph at the max)
    13·1 answer
  • Carolyn's therapist told her to relax and spontaneously say whatever thoughts or images came to her mind. Her therapist was usin
    12·2 answers
  • Salary and years of education are typically ________ correlated, and grade-point average and the number of hours of television w
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!