1- The correct answer is A. Samuel Houston was the Texan leader who most supported the annexation to the United States. In fact, he was President of the Republic of Texas twice, and from his position he always fought for annexation, unlike others like Mirabeau Lamar. In addition, it is stated that Houston went to Texas sent by President Andrew Jackson to achieve annexation.
2- Houston argued that the annexation had to be carried out to respect the will and right of the Texan people (which were made up of American settlers) to decide the legal status of their territory. This argument is related to the right of self-determination of peoples, which I consider valid since it's theb population who has the power to decide on their future and that of the territory they inhabit and administer, not being the states able to make decisions contrary to the people and their will.
It set a post war objective of democratization and liberalization of eastern Europe countries.
by the second conference, however, Stalin had already reneged on the plan and had started establishing satellite communist states in the region, which ultimately destroyed relation and brought about mistrust among the allies.
Answer:
B. Royal order.
Explanation:
A farmān is a royal or governmental decree or order that is issued in the name of the ruler or leader. This official decree can also be called a command, judgment, etc.
Farmāns are used or issued by Mughal emperors or during the Mughal era. These orders present the highest form of orders or decrees in the authoritative powers of the community or society.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
It was the
strategy of Attrition.<span>Washington saw, particularly
after the fall of New York in 1776, that, despite the fact that his little
armed force couldn't guard every one of the urban areas in America, its
presence only guaranteed that the revolution would proceed. Without a genuine
normal armed force, he stayed away from any definitive conflict with the expert
English forces in favor of a strategy of attrition, fighting just when the
chances were unmistakably to support him.</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "the Thirty Years' War." Israel defeated Egypt, Jordan, and Syria in <span>the Thirty Years' War. They were not involved in the second World War.</span>
