False John brown was going against the southerners
Answer:
1. The Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street brawl between American colonists and a lone British soldier, but quickly escalated to a chaotic, bloody slaughter. The conflict energized anti-British sentiment and paved the way for the American .
2. Tensions began to grow, and in Boston in February 1770 a patriot mob attacked a British loyalist, who fired a gun at them, killing a boy. In the ensuing days brawls between colonists and British soldiers eventually culminated in the Boston Massacre.
3.The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a "patriot" mob, throwing snowballs, stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed and this led to a campaign by speech-writers to rouse the ire of the citizenry.
4. Skirmishes between colonists and soldiers—and between patriot colonists and colonists loyal to Britain (loyalists)—were increasingly common. His gunfire struck and killed an 11-year-old boy named Christopher Seider and further enraged the patriots.
5.John Adams agreed to defend the eight British soldiers in court, risking his political status, due to his belief in fairness of law and justice, the basic structure of laws in the United States. In the end of his battle for integrity of the law, his sacrifices were rewarded when he won the case.
Hope this helps :)
Treaty of Versailles carved out disproportionate shares of land between the winners.
Explanation:
The Treaty of Versailles was supposed to end the war and be on the terms that it does not make another contest arise between the powers of Europe.
However, the winners of the war carved out a huge share of the land between themselves and Russia and effectively ended the empire of Austro Hungary.
Germany also got the short end of the stick and Italy did not negotiate its position well.
This left the countries dissatisfied and germinated the seeds of another conflict that led to the second world war.
Answer:
As a result the defense focused on the actions of the mob that threatened the soldiers rather on who shouted “fire”. ... He made clear that the soldiers were endangered and they had the right to fire in self-defense and that at most they were guilty of manslaughter and not of murder.
Explanation:
