1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
3 years ago
15

Which 3 nato countries were not founder members?

History
2 answers:
borishaifa [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Albania, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States.

Explanation:

Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Twelve countries took part in the founding of NATO: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In 1952, Greece and Turkey became members of the Alliance, joined later by West Germany (in 1955) and Spain (in 1982).

You might be interested in
Write a 150-word paragraph in which you consider the effect of the Black Power movement on the nonviolent protest movement in th
kompoz [17]
I will provide some ideas for you to write the 150-words paragraph. 

* several forms of activism. some were violent and some other were peaceful.
* motivation of black people in America- Empowerment.
*black power organization dedicated to socialism (used violence)
* police arrested many people for violence.
* In the Caribbean, the Black Power Revolution was created. 
** The Black Panther Party- they used guns openly to protect the Party from the police. 
5 0
3 years ago
Karl Marx believed the key to social stratification is the
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

b. division between those who own and operate the means of production and those who sell their labor in capitalist societies.

Explanation:

Karl Marx advocates in his book "Das Kapital" (The Capital) that the labors sell the only thing they have, in this case, their strength. This happened, according to Marx, that during the capitalist development, some individuals gain economic power and then began to possess the production means, obligating the ones who didn't have the same to sell the strength in exchange for a sum of money.

6 0
4 years ago
When francisco pizarro defeated inca was it his first trip to the Americas
olga55 [171]

The Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire was one of the most important campaigns in the Spanish colonization of the Americas. After years of preliminary exploration and military skirmishes, 180 Spanish soldiers under conquistador Francisco Pizarro, his brothers, and their native alliescaptured the Sapa Inca Atahualpa in the 1532 Battle of Cajamarca. It was the first step in a long campaign that took decades of fighting but ended in Spanish victory in 1572 and colonization of the region as the Viceroyalty of Peru. The conquest of the Inca Empire (called "Tahuantinsuyu"[1] or "Tawantinsuyu"[2] in Quechua, meaning "Realm of the Four Parts"),[3] led to spin-off campaigns into present-day Chile and Colombia, as well as expeditions towards the Amazon Basin.

When the Spanish arrived at the borders of the Inca Empire in 1528, it spanned a considerable area; by far the largest of the four grand pre-Columbian civilizations. Extending southward from the Ancomayo, which is now known as the Patía River, in southern present-day Colombia to the Maule River in what would later be known as Chile, and eastward from the Pacific Ocean to the edge of the Amazonian jungles, the empire covered some of the most mountainous terrain on Earth. In less than a century, the Inca had expanded their empire from about 400,000 km² (155,000 sq mi) in 1448, to 1,800,000 km² (690,000 sq mi) in 1528, just before the arrival of the Spanish. This vast area of land varied greatly in cultures and in climate. Because of the diverse cultures and geography, the Inca allowed many areas of the empire to be governed under the control of local leaders, who were watched and monitored by Inca officials. However, under the administrative mechanisms established by the Inca, all parts of the empire answered to, and were ultimately under the direct control of, the Emperor.[4] Scholars estimate that the population of the Inca Empire numbered more than 16,000,000.[5]

Some scholars, such as Jared Diamond, believe that while the Spanish conquest was undoubtedly the proximate cause of the collapse of the Inca Empire, it may very well have been past its peak and already in the process of decline. In 1528, Emperor Huayna Capac ruled the Inca Empire. He could trace his lineage back to a "stranger king" named Manco Cápac, the mythical founder of the Inca clan,[6]:144 who according to tradition emerged from a cave in a region called Pacariqtambo.

Huayna Capac was the son of the previous ruler, Túpac Inca, and the grandson of Pachacuti, the Emperor who

7 0
3 years ago
why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0
3 years ago
- - - - - -is the systematic study of the ways interaction, interdependence and influence among persons affect their behavior an
Artist 52 [7]
Social Psychology is the systematic study of the ways interaction, interdependence and influence among persons affect their behavior and thoughts.

Industrial Psychology is a branch of psychology which understands individuals at their workplace and how the theoretical principles of psychology can be applied.

Anthropology is the scientific study of man and his proceedings.

Sociology is the scientific study of social behavior or society.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the United States back a UN resolution demanding that Iraqi troops withdraw from Kuwait?
    5·2 answers
  • Who is considered the leading anti federalist ,as he opposed ratification of the constitution ,was instrumental
    13·2 answers
  • What was the impact of the battle of the Little Bighorn?​
    6·2 answers
  • Where were the earliest military forts located in Oklahoma?
    12·2 answers
  • Increase or decrease together.
    10·1 answer
  • Pls, no file I can't open them! there is a pic
    8·2 answers
  • The explosion aboard the USS Maine provided a convenient excuse for the United States to enter into a war with Spain. In what ot
    9·1 answer
  • How were Chinese immigrants treated in 1800's​
    5·1 answer
  • A) These are the first five terms in a Fibonacci sequence
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Reformation refers to the reforming of the church.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!