Answer:
D. Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.
Explanation:
Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.
Hope this helps ;)
Montesquieu concluded that the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and judicial branches were separate and kept each other in check so that no branch became too powerful.
The concept of dividing government power into three branches was dubbed "separation of powers" by Montesquieu.
He believed it was critical to establish separate branches of government with equal but distinct powers. In this manner, the government would avoid vesting too much power in a single person or group of people. According to Montesquieu, there are three types of governments: republican governments (which can be democratic or aristocratic), monarchies, and despotisms.
Montesquieu concluded that the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and judicial branches were separate and kept each other in check so that no branch became too powerful.
Learn more on Montesquieu-
brainly.com/question/8539732
#SPJ9
Idk what A B C and D answers are but I know that the answer to the question is Texas (not sure about territory tho)
was not yet ready to give up on Truman's domestic agenda.
I think that it is important to study history whilst you have the chance as if you done you may regret it .History gives you a wide range of opportunities careers and vocabulary.You benefit from history due to the amount you learn in it .Everything you learn is based on a certain time period which could help you in other lessons .
Without history you will not be able to understand questions about time periods in your GCSE as they won’t become clear .The two questions are how do we know that all of these events happened as we don’t have much evidence
