Answer:
true
Explanation:
because
The two religions, Shinto and Buddhism, harmoniously coexist and even complement each other to a certain degree. Many Japanese people consider themselves Shintoist, Buddhist, or both. Shintoism is as old as Japanese culture itself.
Answer:
The climate they live in is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The March revolution or The Russian Revolution of 1917. The Russian Revolution of 1917 involved the collapse of an empire under Tsar Nicholas II and the rise of Marxian socialism under Lenin and his Bolsheviks. It sparked the beginning of a new era in Russia that had effects on countries around the world. I hope that helps!
Answer:
The reading shows that musical trends increase the demand in the music industry and stimulate the supply of this industry. However, the trends tend to be transient, providing a decrease in demand and consequently in supply, which makes the music industry highly volatile.
Explanation:
The music industry is a highly volatile economic sector with drastic changes in demand and supply, due to the frequent musical trends that are established.
When a musical trend is launched (kpop, for example), there is a large number of consumers who want this trend to be very active in the market. These consumers increase the demand for products of this trend, which makes the production large and the number of suppliers of important supplies for this production is very efficient. In this case, if the production is high, the supply is also high.
However, trends tend to disappear over time, decreasing the number of consumers. Thus, the production of products of this trend must be reduced and, consequently, the supply of this trend decreases. However, a musical trend decreases with the rise of another trend, which will drive the increase in demand and supply again.
Answer:
Explanation:Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them. The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
