Answer: <em>Option (B) is correct.</em>
Explanation:
If true, the following will most seriously weakens the argument: There has been an increasing rate in store opening in the central shopping district (CSD) since Colson's have opened discount stores.
Since after Colson's opened, the locations which were vacant became stores in particular discount store which did not spar with Colson's. Now that we have a discount store & department store without discount. Therefore when these stores close while competing with SpendLess, they wont be replaced with regular non-discount stores .
<u>This is an example of "outsourcing".</u>
Outsourcing is the business routine with regards to procuring a gathering outside an organization to perform benefits and make products that generally were performed in-house by the organization's own representatives and staff. Generally done as a cost-cutting measure, it can influence occupations going from client support to assembling to the back office.
Outsourcing can enable organizations to lessen work costs essentially by outsourcing certain assignments. Organizations can likewise dodge costs related with overhead, gear and innovation.
To complete the above question, please see below:
Sub-Prime Loan Company is thinking of opening a new office, and the key data are shown below. The company owns the building that would be used, and it could sell it for $100,000 after taxes if it decides not to open the new office. The equipment for the project would be depreciated by the straight-line method over the project's 3-year life, after which it would be worth nothing and thus it would have a zero salvage value. No change in net operating working capital would be required, and revenues and other operating costs would be constant over the project's 3-year life. What is the project's NPV? (Hint: Cash flows are constant in Years 1-3.)
<span>WACC 10.0% </span>
<span>Opportunity cost $100,000 </span>
<span>Net equipment cost (depreciable basis) $65,000 </span>
<span>Straight-line depreciation rate for equipment 33.333% </span>
<span>Annual sales revenues $123,000 </span>
<span>Annual operating costs (excl. depreciation) $25,000 </span>
<span>Tax rate 35%
</span>
The answer is <span>12,271</span>
Answer:
In the given year, American population grew by 4% while China's population grew by 1.2%.
Explanation:
The present problem establishes that in one year the populations of China and the United States both increased by 12 million people. But both countries have different populations: China has a population of 1 billion inhabitants, while the United States has 300 million.
To determine the percentage of population increase in each country, we must perform cross multiplications:
-U.S:
300 = 100
12 = X
(12 x 100) / 300 = X
1,200 / 300 = X
4 = X
The United States grew by population 4% in the year.
-China:
1,000 = 100
12 = X
(12 x 100) / 1,000 = X
1,200 / 1,000 = X
1.2 = X
China grew by population 1.2% in the same period of time.
What kind of absurd logic is that?
oh, let me not talk for a few days maybe I might end up sounding like a girl. yeah, good luck with that mate.
