All categories

3 years ago

Which is one advantage of owning a home compared to renting a place to live?

1 answer:

8 0

Id have to go with the last one

Answer: homeowners can make a profit on the sale of their home.

Explanation: when your renting out a place and you decide to go live somewhere else, you can’t sell that house because it’s not yours! You were just renting it. Only the Landlord can sell the property after you move somewhere else.
Owning a home on the other hand can give you the benefit of making a profit from it. If you ever decide to move, you can sell the house and make money off of whoever is renting it!

You might be interested in

The inflation premium: A. increases the real return. B. is inversely related to the time to maturity. C. remains constant over t

krok68 [10]

Answer:

The answer is E. compensates investors for expected price increases.

Explanation:

Inflation premium arise from that, investors holding nominal assets

are exposed to unanticipated changes in inflation.

8 0

4 years ago

A ________ is a retail firm owned by its customers. Members contribute money to open their own store, vote on its policies, elec

myrzilka [38]

Answer:

A consumer co-operative

Explanation:

A consumer co-operative is a type of retail business owned by an association of consumers. The consumers who form the venture manage it and share in its profits. The main objective of starting a consumer co-operative is to eliminate intermediaries.

A consumer co-operative has the benefit of economies of scale as it purchases in bulk. It can afford to offer its members more competitive prices. Members of the co-operative share profits in the ratio of capital contribution. Their liability is limited to share contribution. Membership is voluntary, and they usually transact on a cash basis.

3 0

4 years ago

In the year 2020, a divorced woman under age 50 collects $50,000 of alimony and child support as her sole source of income. The

NikAS [45]

The available options are:

A. No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income

B. A contribution of up to $6,000 is permitted, but the contribution is not tax deductible.

C. A tax deductible contribution of up to $7,000 is permitted

D. A tax deductible contribution of up to $9,000 is permitted

Answer:

No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income

Explanation:

Unlike in the previous years before 2019, concerning divorce agreements, alimony is now declared to be no longer deductible by the payor and at the same time is considered to be a tax-free income to the recipient. In essence, this indicates that alimony is no longer qualifies as earned income and therefore, cannot be utilized to fund an Individual Retirement Account.

Hence, in this case, since it is , year 2020, the correct answer is "No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income."

8 0

3 years ago

Compared with many european countries the party in government system in the united states

ludmilkaskok [199]

<span>Compared with many European countries the party in government system in the united states is less differentiated. (have a lesser amount)

In many European countries, the parties that involved within the government could account to more than 4 parties. Meanwhile, there are only 2 major political parties in the United States, Democratic party and the republican party</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Tanner is choosing between two mutually-exclusive investment options. These options have absolutely no risk, and Tanner can al

Reika [66]

Answer:

D) Tanner should be indifferent between the two investments, since both are equivalent to the same amount of cash today.

Explanation:

Here are the options to this question:

A) $531.40 later today, since $1 today is worth more than $1 in one year.

B) $550 in one year, since it is $50 more than he invested rather than $31.40 more than he invested.

C) Neither - both investments have a negative NPV.

D) Tanner should be indifferent between the two investments, since both are equivalent to the same amount of cash today.

Net present value is the present value of after tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.

NPV can be calculated using a financial calculator:

For the first option:

Cash flow in year 0 = $500

Cash flow in year 1 = $550

I = 3.5%

NPV = $31.40

For the second option:

NPV = $631.40 - $600 = $31.40

The npv of both options are equal and postive. So, Tanner should be indifferent between the options.

To find the NPV using a financial calacutor:

1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.

3. Press compute

I hope my answer helps you

5 0

4 years ago