1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nikitich [7]
3 years ago
10

The Supreme Court’s decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

History
2 answers:
diamong [38]3 years ago
6 0

The Supreme Court decisions in both cases held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. The Supreme court ruled that the police could conduct searches if they had probable cause and that the constitution does not prohibit that

gizmo_the_mogwai [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:  The correct answer is : They argued that the police can in some cases register individuals or confiscate their property without the need for a court order.

Explanation:  In the Terry v Ohio case, it was argued that when an officer suspects that a person may have a weapon, it is logical that he seek the weapons because of the danger he poses to himself and others. In the case Horton v California argues that when evidence is discovered it should not go unnoticed.

You might be interested in
Why did the Republicans nominate Frémont for president in 1856?
Mazyrski [523]

Answer:

The 1856 Republican National Convention nominated a ticket led by Frémont, an explorer and military officer who had served in the Mexican–American War. Frémont opposed the expansion of slavery.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which statement best expresses a common belief among nativists in the late 1800s and early 1900s?
siniylev [52]

Answer:

The right answer is:

(4) "America is for Americans."

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
If the president needed to settle a diplomatic situation with Great Britain, which Cabinet position would most likely be sent ca
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
The United States Ambassador to the United Nations<span> is the leader of the U.S. delegation, the </span>U.S. Mission<span> to the </span>United Nations. The position is more formally known as the "Permanent Representative<span> of the </span>United States<span> of America to the </span>United Nations<span>, with the rank and status of </span>Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary<span>, and Representative of the United States of America in the </span>Security Council of the United Nations<span>"; it is also known as the U.S. Permanent Representative, or "Perm Rep", to the United Nations</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What are the three parts of the consitituion
mojhsa [17]
There are the articles, the amendments and the preamble.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
History help me answer all pls
likoan [24]
Can't see it so I can't help
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the responsibility of the tribal assembly in the early roman republic?
    7·1 answer
  • The magma carts is most important for which reason
    15·2 answers
  • One difference between a manager and an entrepreneur is that an entrepreneur is willing to
    8·2 answers
  • Which answer best describes how Democratic-Republicans during Jackson's era felt about the Constitution? (1 point) They thought
    14·2 answers
  • Why America and Japan had fallen out by 1941?<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • The vast spread of reformation ideas after 1453 can best be attributed to
    5·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I BEG YOU 18 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • I am 136 cm tall and my elder brother is 2m tall. How much taller is my elder brother than I? ???​
    14·1 answer
  • The Cold War was a conflict between __________.
    13·2 answers
  • The map below shows agriculture in the Middle East.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!