The Supreme Court decisions in both cases held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. The Supreme court ruled that the police could conduct searches if they had probable cause and that the constitution does not prohibit that
Answer: The correct answer is : They argued that the police can in some cases register individuals or confiscate their property without the need for a court order.
Explanation: In the Terry v Ohio case, it was argued that when an officer suspects that a person may have a weapon, it is logical that he seek the weapons because of the danger he poses to himself and others. In the case Horton v California argues that when evidence is discovered it should not go unnoticed.
isagoras ignored the reforms of Solon. ... To form a new government, they called Cleisthenes from his exile, and gave him free reign to complete his interrupted reforms. With the people of Athens behind him, Cleisthenes created the first government of the people, by the people and for the people
