1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
4 years ago
10

An effect of the Long March was that communists were able to recruit peasants far from the reach of the

History
2 answers:
kaheart [24]4 years ago
8 0
An effect of the Long March was that communists were able to recruit peasants far from the reach of the <span>Kuomintang (KMT or Chinese Nationalist Party) army.</span>
stich3 [128]4 years ago
4 0

The answer is the Kuomintang (Chinese Nationalist Party).

The Long March was a trip throughout the interior of China made by the troops of the Chinese Red Army and the armed forces of the Chinese Communist Party between 1934 and 1935, who were fleeing from the army of the Republic of China. Years before, the Communists had a zone under control in the South of the country where they established the Soviet Republic of China, but they were besieged by the Chinese army in 1934 and, therefore, they started the Long March to the interior of the country.

During this trip, the Communists led by Mao Zedong escaped to the West and the North for an entire year. Being far away from the reach of the Chinese Nationalist Party that was in the power allowed them to recruit a large number of peasants to their cause. The hardness of the trip throughout interior China would make of this one of the most significant and determining episodes in the history of the Chinese Communist Party.

You might be interested in
What happened during the Reign of Terror in France? Suspected political opponents were jailed or executed. Guards fired on prote
IrinaVladis [17]
<span>Suspected political opponents were jailed or executed.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What year did Abraham leave Mesopotamia because he believed God called him to find a new nation?​
mario62 [17]

Answer:

3 (Jewish Museum, New York)

See also: Endogamy and Wife–sister narratives in the Book of Genesis

Abraham settled between Kadesh and Shur in what the Bible anachronistically calls "the land of the Philistines". While he was living in Gerar, Abraham openly claimed that Sarah was his sister. Upon discovering this news, King Abimelech had her brought to him. God then came to Abimelech in a dream and declared that taking her would result in death because she was a man's wife. Abimelech had not laid hands on her, so he inquired if he would also slay a righteous nation, especially since Abraham had claimed that he and Sarah were siblings. In response, God told Abimelech that he did indeed have a blameless heart and that is why he continued to exist. However, should he not return the wife of Abraham back to him, God would surely destroy Abimelech and his entire household. Abimelech was informed that Abraham was a prophet who would pray for him.[Genesis 20:1–7]

Early next morning, Abimelech informed his servants of his dream and approached Abraham inquiring as to why he had brought such great guilt upon his kingdom. Abraham stated that he thought there was no fear of God in that place, and that they might kill him for his wife. Then Abraham defended what he had said as not being a lie at all: "And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife."[Genesis 20:12] Abimelech returned Sarah to Abraham, and gave him gifts of sheep, oxen, and servants; and invited him to settle wherever he pleased in Abimelech's lands. Further, Abimelech gave Abraham a thousand pieces of silver to serve as Sarah's vindication before all. Abraham then prayed for Abimelech and his household, since God had stricken the women with infertility because of the taking of Sarah.[Genesis 20:8–18]

After living for some time in the land of the Philistines, Abimelech and Phicol, the chief of his troops, approached Abraham because of a dispute that resulted in a violent confrontation at a well. Abraham then reproached Abimelech due to his Philistine servant's aggressive attacks and the seizing of Abraham's well. Abimelech claimed ignorance of the incident. Then Abraham offered a pact by providing sheep and oxen to Abimelech. Further, to attest that Abraham was the one who dug the well, he also gave Abimelech seven ewes for proof. Because of this sworn oath, they called the place of this well: Beersheba. After Abimelech and Phicol headed back to Philistia, Abraham planted a tamarisk grove in Beersheba and called upon "the name of the LORD, the everlasting God."[Genesis 21:22–34]

Isaac

Abraham about to sacrifice Isaac, from an East Anglian missal, c. 1315 (National Library of Wales, Aberystwyth)

Sacrifice of Isaac, by Caravaggio, c. 1603 (Uffizi, Florence)

As had been prophesied in Mamre the previous year,[Genesis 17:21] Sarah became pregnant and bore a son to Abraham, on the first anniversary of the covenant of circumcision. Abraham was "an hundred years old", when his son whom he named Isaac was born; and he circumcised him when he was eight days old.[Genesis] For Sarah, the thought of giving birth and nursing a child, at such an old age, also brought her much laughter, as she declared, "God hath made me to laugh, so that all who hear will laugh with me."[Genesis] Isaac continued to grow and on the day he was weaned, Abraham held a great feast to honor the occasion. During the celebration, however, Sarah found Ishmael mocking; an observation that would begin to clarify the birthright of Isaac.[Genesis 21:8–13]

8 0
3 years ago
Look at picture and answer
FinnZ [79.3K]
D people we’re equally treated
8 0
2 years ago
Why did the founders of Rhode Island and Connecticut leave the Massachusetts Bay Colony?
ryzh [129]

Answer:

Religious dissident Roger Williams is banished from the Massachusetts Bay Colony by the General Court of Massachusetts. Williams had spoken out against the right of civil authorities to punish religious dissension and to confiscate Native American land

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why did the Europeans treat the slaves so badly during the Middle Passage? A. A slave who was treated badly was considered more
Ugo [173]

Answer B: They viewed them as property rather than as people

The Middle Passage was the stage of the triangular trade in which millions of Africans were forcibly transported to the New World as part of the Atlantic slave trade. Ships departed Europe for African markets with manufactured goods, which were traded for purchased or kidnapped Africans, who were transported across the Atlantic as slaves; the slaves were then sold or traded for raw materials, which would be transported back to Europe to complete the voyage. Voyages on the Middle Passage were large financial undertakings, generally organized by companies or groups of investors rather than individuals

Slaves' treatment was horrific because the captured African men and women were considered less than human; they were "cargo", or "goods", and treated as such; they were transported for marketing.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Place the following events in chronological order.
    13·2 answers
  • The Grange specifically pressured state governments to regulate
    6·2 answers
  • Describe Egyptian culture including details on their government, religion, and social structure.
    9·1 answer
  • This is a single party political and economic systems ruled by dictatorship
    11·1 answer
  • Help pleaseee <br> I will give brainlest and 5 stars
    13·1 answer
  • I wanna know Who was Abraham ?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the failures of World War I lead to World War II?
    15·1 answer
  • Easy 18 points<br><br> whats the abstract of the19th amendment
    6·1 answer
  • Which sector of Germany’s economy had the highest GDP?
    8·2 answers
  • Answer the learning objective: How have environmental factors affected
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!