A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
<h3>What is bias?</h3>
Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.
Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.
Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300
#SPJ1
The problem was that the colonists were trying to take away a land which belonged to another people. Some native americans were able to let them go and enable them to live in peace where they chose, other native americans decided they would opt for the more harmful choice.
He had 2 nicknames Iron Prefect and II Duce
Answer:
Diversity highlight the difference that exist between different social groups that interact with one another.
Explanation:
Diversity does not only revolves around races, it can also include differences in culture, language, or historical background.
Africa is a very unique region where different tribes exist and influence wide variety of social aspects in the region. They have their own tradition, rules, arts, and basic standards of what considered to be right and wrong.
