Answer:
Check kiter.
Explanation:
What the exercise describes is a form of fraud commited with checks. The check kiter would take advantage of the float to make use of funds (that do not exist) in a bank account transforming a check in a form of unauthorized credit, like the exercise examplifies: Out of 2 accounts, you issue a check that overdraws their accout at bank 1, and then deposits a check in that account from their bank 2 to cover the first check. You "abuse" the float to make use of funds that don't exist.
Answer: Amicus curiae
Explanation: Amicus curiae is the person who provides case related information, guidance,expertise,interest in that field etc to the court which can help and impact the case in influential manner.
Amicus curiae is not the person that belongs or is part of case rather provides information as external factor working for the court.He/she is also remarked as "friend of the court"
I would say some people take, individual differences too personally, and then conflict starts, people fight, argue, even start wars.
Of course not. Freedom of speech has numerous limitations
Answer:
Unalienable rights are those which cannot be taken away. They are guaranteed and you can't forfeit or give them up.
