There a lot of different reason, but several would be the "Tariff of Abominations", political parties and public debt.
The answer is we dont know
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
Answer:
B too much of society's resources is being used to produce plastic.
Explanation:
From the actions of the plastic manufacturing plants, the environment is being polluted and thus has a result in the ecosystem, individuals such as the fishermen are rendered jobless with no compensation.
It can be concluded that too much of society's resources is being used to produce plastic.
Option C would have been corrected if the fishermen were compensated and pollutants treated to reduce toxicity.
Option D is also wrong.
G.) The greater a state's population , the more votes it would have.
