Answer:John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
Explanation:
According to research, a Collectivistic culture as seen in countries like China, Korea, and Japan, is one that characterized by group prioritization above personal interest while Individualistic culture as seen in countries like United States is one characterized by individual's needs before group goals.
Also, Social loafing is a situation where an individual put less effort when working as a group to perform a task to achieve a goal, but may give his best when working solely on the project.
From the definitions above, its likely that an individual with a social loafing mindset may come from an individualistic culture as seen in a country like United States. Therefore, we can infer that John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
Construction hunting oils drilling pollution
Answer:
The four types are : Community engagement with a focus on community development or community building . Community participation in consultation and decision making . Community engagement that helps organisations and businesses to improve their service delivery or to achieve their goals .
<em>hop</em><em>e</em><em> this</em><em> answer</em><em> correct</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>^</em><em>^</em><em>)</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
Answer:
Reducing trade barriers
Explanation:
<u>If governments choose protectionism, they harm citizens who could benefit from the products, services or jobs offered by foreign companies.</u>
If, for example, the “A” government sets <em>tariffs to protect the domestic market</em>, the “B” government <em>could respond with tariffs in retaliation</em>, which would result in both countries being harmed. So, the problem of trade warfare is still represented by a “Prisoner's Dilemma” game because it says that two people, in this case, two governments, can decide not to cooperate even if it goes against the interest of both.
On the other hand, <em>unrestricted free trade could go against governments that develop trade policies based on national economic well-being.</em>
The game's equilibrium solution would be for both countries to opt to reduce their trade barriers through negotiations.
b because it looks like b
