Here is the solution of the given problem above.
First, let's analyze the question.
Given: 1 bag = 9/10 pound
2/3 bag = ? pound
What we are going to do is to divide 9/10 pound to 3.
so 9/10 divided by 3 and we get 9/30 and to simplify that, 3/10.
So per 1/3 of the bag, there is 3/10 pound.
To get the weight for 2/3 of the bag, we multiply 3/10 by 2 and we get 6/10 or to simplify it, it is 3/5. Therefore, the 2/3 bag weights 3/5 pound. Hope this answer helps.
Using the binomial distribution, it is found that the expected values are given by:
a) 120.
b) 150.
<h3>What is the binomial probability distribution?</h3>
It is the probability of <u>exactly x successes on n repeated trials, with p probability</u> of a success on each trial.
The expected value of the binomial distribution is:
E(X) = np
In this problem, for both items, we consider that the number cube is rolled 180 times, hence n = 180.
Item a:
4 of the 6 possible values are greater than 2, hence p = 4/6 = 2/3.
The expected value is given by:
E(X) = 180 x 2/3 = 120.
Item b:
5 of the 6 values are less than 6, hence p = 5/6.
The expected value is given by:
E(X) = 180 x 5/6 = 150.
More can be learned about the binomial distribution at brainly.com/question/24863377
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Good evening ,
I guess it’s the C expression,
Because, C. 3n^2+n-2 so the coefficient of the term n is 1 and the coefficient of the term n^2 is 3
:)
Answer:
positive
Step-by-step explanation:
it is positive
Answer:
The solution can be defined as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
Wetland Percentage:
![0] 9\\\\1] None\\\\2] 0 4 7\\\\3] 0 3 5 5 5 7 8\\\\4] 2 2 5 5 8\\\\5] 0 0 1 1 5 9 9\\\\6] 0 8\\\\7] 1\\\\8] 7 7 9\\\\9] 0\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=0%5D%209%5C%5C%5C%5C1%5D%20None%5C%5C%5C%5C2%5D%200%204%207%5C%5C%5C%5C3%5D%200%203%205%205%205%207%208%5C%5C%5C%5C4%5D%202%202%205%205%208%5C%5C%5C%5C5%5D%200%200%201%201%205%209%209%5C%5C%5C%5C6%5D%200%208%5C%5C%5C%5C7%5D%201%5C%5C%5C%5C8%5D%207%207%209%5C%5C%5C%5C9%5D%200%5C%5C)
- These details are very symmetrical, perhaps pretty biased.
- There might be a gap whereby shows that none of the 48 lowest states have lost 10 to 19% of all its wetlands.
- These statistics were distributed between 20% and 60%.
