Which fiscal policy strategy do you think policymakers would use in each of these scenarios? (

1 answer:

8 0

The fiscal policy strategy for policymakers in the first scenario of rising inflation and real GDP up 4% could be to raise interest rates to make money more expensive to get a loan and thus cool inflation and in the second scenario if GDP is downn and unemployment is 10% would be to lower the interest rate to make borrowing easier to make it easier for potential employers to advance theri projects and thus promote employment.

You might be interested in

If a company would still have a cash flow item even if they rejected potential new Project A, should this particular cash flow i

FrozenT [24]

Answer: No

Explanation:

When computing a project analysis for a project, only relevant cash flow should be included in the Project's cash flow analysis. Relevant cash-flow are those that will only occur if the project was embarked on.

If the cash flow in question is still going to occur even if the project wasn't initiated as is the case with Project A, it is not a relevant cash-flow and should not be included in the cash-flow analysis.

8 0

3 years ago

What is one reason that more affluent individuals may experience better health?

andrew-mc [135]

They can afford top notch healthcare

3 0

3 years ago

Douglas County sought bids for a construction project. Robert Taggart wanted to submit a bid but knew the project needed rock. H

Jet001 [13]

Answer:

No, there is no contract between the two parties because of withdrawal of offer (Revocation) before the acceptance of the other party.

Explanation:

When one party offers another party and after some time the offer maker withdraws the offer by communicating that they had revoked then the offer is no more available to the other party and is often termed as Revocation. So when the offer maker revokes before the acceptance of the offer by the other party then their is no offer at consideration to the other party, which means if there is no offer then their can not be an acceptance of an offer and of course when there is no acceptance then there is no contract.

The communication of revocation was held before the acceptance of the offer of the other party which agains says that the contract was not actually formed.

4 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP

olasank [31]

The correct answer is A. A publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use.

Explanation

Internal compliance is a set of strategic internal rules and measures focused on employee behavior and ethics. This internal Compliance was obtained with the aim of improving business practices aimed at raising the quality level of results, goals, and objectives. According to the above, the correct answer is "A. publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use." because this is an example of a business rule that pre-empted the misuse of company equipment preventing its employees from using it for purposes other than corporate ones.

8 0

3 years ago

Jo is duly notified that her mortgage with Fund All Savings has been transferred to Big Loan Co. and that she should henceforth

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

Option D; JO IS LIABLE TO BIG LOAN CO. SINCE SHE RECEIVED A NOTICE FROM THEM ABOUT THE ASSIGNMENT.

Explanation:

A mortgage is a loan provided by a mortgage lender or a bank that enables an individual to purchase a home.

Mortgage payments usually occur on a monthly basis and consist of four main parts: principal, interest, taxes and insurance.

A transfer of mortgage is the reassignment of an existing mortgage, usually on a home, from the current holder to another person or entity.

When mortgage is transferred, two notices will be sent: one from the current mortgage servicer and the other from the new servicer. All payments after the notification will be made to the new servicer.

Since Jo was notified about the reassignment from Fund All Savings to Big loan Co. but still continues to pay Fund All Savings and Big Loan Co. sues Jo for nonpayment. What is most likely to be the court's judgement is that JO IS LIABLE TO BIG LOAN Co. SINCE SHE RECEIVED A NOTICE FROM THEM ABOUT THE ASSIGNMENT.

5 0

3 years ago