He will borrow 80% of the cost of the car.
80/100*11350= <span>$ 9080</span>
Complete Question:
Nathan manages a website that sells bicycles. He's using a Google Ads Display campaign to drive purchases in that segment, and chooses In-Market audiences as his targeting option. What's the advantage In-Market audiences gives Nathan in reaching his marketing goals?
- Reaches users based on their lifestyles, interests, and passions.
- Shows ads to users based on a combination of declared and inferred data.
- Connects him with audiences most interested in what he has to offer.
- Finds users that are similar to an original remarketing list.
Answer:
The advantage In-Market audiences gives Nathan in reaching his marketing goals is Connects him with audiences most interested in what he has to offer.
Explanation:
The advantage of a target reach lies in Nathan's ability to connect him to the motorcycle sales on the website.
He will accelerate sales in that category with the Google Advertising Show plan.
With specific segments which identify users based on their demonstrated consumer behaviour and purpose, you can connect with people who are most interested in what you can give.
International business research is only beginning to develop theory and evidence highlighting the importance of supranational regional institutions to explain firm internationalization. In this context, we offer new theory and evidence regarding the effect of a region's "institutional complexity" on foreign direct investment decisions by multinational enterprises (MNEs). We define a region's institutional complexity using two components, regional institutional diversity and number of countries. We explore the unique relationships of both components with MNEs' decisions to internationalize into countries within the region. Drawing on semiglobalization and regionalization research and institutional theory, we posit an inverted U-shaped relationship between a region's institutional diversity and MNE internationalization: extremely low or high regional institutional diversity has negative effects on internationalization, but moderate diversity has a positive effect on internationalization. Larger numbers of countries within the region reduces MNE internationalization in a linear fashion. We find support for these predicted relationships in multilevel analyses of 698 Japanese MNEs operating in 49 countries within 9 regions. Regional institutional complexity is both a challenge and an opportunity for MNEs seeking advantages through the aggregation and arbitrage of individual country factors.
