They are traveling at right angles to each other so we can say one is traveling north to south and the other west to east. Then we can say that there positions, y and x are:
y=150-600t x=200-800t
By using the Pythagorean Theorem we can find the distance between these two planes as a function of time:
d^2=y^2+x^2, using y and x from above
d^2=(150-600t)^2+(200-800t)^2
d^2=22500-180000t+360000t^2+40000-320000t+640000t^2
d^2=1000000t^2-500000t+62500
d=√(1000000t^2-500000t+6250)
So the rate of change is the derivative of d
dd/dt=(1/2)(2000000t-500000)/√(1000000t^2-500000t+6250)
dd/dt=(1000000t-250000)/√(1000000t^2-500000t+6250)
So the rate depends upon t and is not a constant, so for the instantaneous rate you would plug in a specific value of t...
...
To find how much time the controller has to change the airplanes flight path, we only need to solve for when d=0, or even d^2=0...
1000000t^2-500000t+62500=0
6250(16t^2-8t+1)=0
6250(16^2-4t-4t+1)=0
6250(4t(4t-1)-1(4t-1))=0
6250(4t-1)(4t-1)=0
6250(4t-1)^2=0
4t-1=0
4t=1
t=1/4 hr
Well technically, the controller has t<1/4 because at t=1/4 impact will occur :)
Answer:
First find line DE using Pythagoras theorem
That's
DE² = 7² + 24²
DE = √ 49 + 576
DE = 25
The correct trigonometric ratio for triangle DEF is
Cos(E) = 24/25
Hope this helps
The answer is 1.7m because 0.9 isnt bigger
Answer:
the axis labels are inconsistent with the graph title
Step-by-step explanation:
The independent variable is described as "% protein digested", and the dependent variable is described as "time." The graphed values suggest that these are reasonable descriptors for the data being plotted.
The title, however, says the data points are "percentage digestion per hour". This is in disagreement with the axis labels, and is inconsistent with the shape of the curve. (If the title is to be believed, the digestion rate is such that more than 100% of <whatever> has been digested after 10 hours.)
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
Another error is the vertical axis is graduated as though it were linear, but it is decidedly non-linear. Equivalent distances on the graph are shown for differences of 10%, 5%, 10% and 25%. That is the scale varies by a factor of 5 from one part of the graph to another.
Given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
<h3>What is a Rectangle?</h3>
- A rectangle is a quadrilateral.
- All four angles in a rectangle are right angles.
- The opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and congruent to each other.
Therefore, based on what we are given and the definition of a rectangle, we can establish that △URS ≅ △STU by SAS.
Since △URS ≅ △STU, therefore ∠USR = ∠SUT by CPCTC.
In conclusion, given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
Learn more about properties of rectangle on:
brainly.com/question/2835318