1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kompoz [17]
3 years ago
10

By devaluating the bolivar, the president of venezuela has.... ( This is the question)

History
2 answers:
kirza4 [7]3 years ago
8 0

By devaluing the Bolivar, the president of Venezuela has artificially decreased the value of the national currency.

What this does it make it more expensive to buy US dollars. In the last 2-3 years, there has been a flight of billion of US dollars out of Venezuela due to the economic disaster looming in the country.

By making it more expensive to buy US Dollars, the President of Venezuela is hoping to decrease the flight of money from the country and protect local reserves.

To what extent this actually works, we will have to see. In many developed countries or countries with a healthy economy, such a strategy might work. However, in the case of Venezuela, the economy is so bad, that even the devaluation of the Bolivar might not help solve much.

Gennadij [26K]3 years ago
5 0
By devaluating the bolivar, the president of Venezuela has....
1) he has brought the official value of Bolivar closer to the actual value - before this, the black market value was a lot lower than the actual value2) as a result, he might have actually made the Bolivar more valuable, because before the difference between the official and black market value made people avoid using the Bolivar and exchange the goods using dollars rather than bolivars
 
You might be interested in
After World War II, the Soviet Union turned many of the countries of Eastern Europe into _____states.
NeX [460]
<span>After World War II, the Soviet Union turned many of the countries of Eastern Europe into </span>satellite states

That means that the states were "independent" but were actually ruled by the Soviet Union behind the scenes. They each had their leaders but all of them had to do what Stalin told them to.
4 0
3 years ago
What effect did signs pointing to fallout shelters have on Americans?
Rasek [7]

Answer:

People began to get scared

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Part II: Application and Critical Thinking (30 points)
madreJ [45]

Answer:

The answer is detailed in the explanation;

Explanation:

<u><em> Dear Sir, Jhon Locke; </em></u>

With my sincere words I do not intend to change his ideals of reform but I do intend to be heard on the basis of the experience of the human being and what characterizes him, it is well known that the man without law is an irrational being incapable of restraining his impulses and actions Likewise, ambition, greed for power causes divisions and doubts to be sown and the fracture of power occurs, that is why an absolute monarchy where absolute power and responsibility falls on only that supreme being already chosen of impartial way to impartially govern all kinds of people without any preference to either side, for me it is and surely being the ideal form of government.

<em><u>Respected Sir; Thomas hobbe :</u></em>

Considering his arguments, I find a heartfelt contradiction; if the power corrupts the human being who by natural tendency is given to ambition and greed; How can absolute power and responsibility be left to govern and educate an entire people in the hands of one man?

Really, in an absolute monarchy there is no freedom, there is no democracy, we need to work as a team to help each other to balance power, although it is true that two heads think more than one, being in a position of responsibility and knowing that we have that answering for our acts before the laws or branches of power causes us to be more cautious when making decisions that could affect our nation, our actions have consequences and a bad control of absolute power undoubtedly brings total chaos.

4 0
3 years ago
When referring to tribal governments, the term "sovereignty" means
rosijanka [135]
He federal government<span>, U.S. </span>tribal sovereignty means<span> that Native ... forward, </span>define<span> and enact </span>sovereignty<span>for all Native American </span>tribes
8 0
3 years ago
What were two reasons that Britain was opposed to the Soviet Union's occupation of Poland after World War II?
dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

Britain was against communism, and the Soviet Union in Poland made the country a communist one. As well, they were losing trade with the country due to Soviet intervention in trades.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is the Renaissance considered a turning point in history?
    11·2 answers
  • In the __________ case in 1908, the supreme court declared that the sherman anti-trust act could be used against trade unions as
    8·1 answer
  • How did entertainers assist the government’s World War II propaganda campaign?
    11·1 answer
  • O protect individual rights, the Anti-Federalists wanted to
    6·2 answers
  • Who served as president of mexico 11 times?
    14·1 answer
  • What contributed to the beginning of the decline of the Roman Empire?
    14·1 answer
  • How did a “corrupt bargain” increase Andrew Jackson’s determination to become president
    10·2 answers
  • 1. What were the Negative effects of the Industrial Revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • What was the main issue surrounding the Compromise of 1850?
    14·2 answers
  • Why do US citizens fear corrupt leaders and Terrorism (needs to be paragraph)
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!