Answer:
1. If it were blm protesters, there would've been shoootings, deaths, tear gas, police officers punching and kicking protesters because the way America views and treats black people, minorities, and poc. They are treated as such that their life doesn't matter and white people are superior and more important.
2. The impact of yesterday's event at the capital proves that white privilge is real. They practically walked into the capital. The difference between that and blm protests is blm supporters are fighting for racial injustice and the trump supporters who raided and destroyed the capital are throwing tantrums cause trump lost. Especially the fact that the president of the US ENCOURAGED them to destroy and raid the capital. And many important people were inside and could've been killed like Mike Pence for instance. He put his on VP in danger. And the trump supporters at the capital were breaking the law by breaking in, smashing desks, stealing mail (which is fraud btw), and be all kinds of violent for what? because trump lost. And they only got treated a fraction of what blm supporters would've been treated
3. No i completely disagree with the methods of the "protesters" at the capital. They werent even protesters. They were criminals and rioters. Breaking the law. There are many other ways they could've done it. They could've simply had a peaceful protest like many BLM supporters did.
Explanation:
It’s is B. France
It was made up of France, Britain, and Russia
No no yes no no yes yes yes no no
Freedom of<span> expression is </span>one<span> of the most precious rights. Many developing nations struggling for </span>democracy<span>, and good governance, </span>do<span> not support </span>freedom of<span> the </span>press<span> and the </span>media<span> in these </span>countries<span> is often restricted or controlled by government censorship.</span>
I'm onI'm only doing this for poems yay sorry for not helping you I do not understand this question or no
