It is A.) On the internet
Answer:
<u><em>The answer is</em></u>: <u>C. the clerk.</u>
<u />
Explanation:
<u>Lawyers of the Administration of Justice
</u>
They direct the Judicial Office exercising, among other things, the direct leadership of all personnel. Therefore, they direct and order the work, respond to the proper functioning of the office, prepare the statistics, inform the competent authority of the needs of personal and material resources of the office.
The lawyers of the Administration of Justice are public employees under the dependence of the Ministry of Justice.
<u><em>The answer is</em></u>: <u>C. the clerk.</u>
Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer:
Hardiness
Explanation:
Hardiness -
It is the personality style , where the person is able to handle a lot of stress and tension and still live a very healthy and happy life , is referred to as hardiness.
It infuses three of the major psychological quantities , i.e. , challenge , control and commitment.
Hence , from the given information of the question, the correct term is hardiness.