Answer:
Explanation:
1. Both these historians think that our history is something important, something that needs to be remembered.
2. These historians both agree that it is important to remember the past. They both agree that we learn from our mistakes of what happened in the past and that it will help determine our future.
You would probably need to expand on these answers but I hope this helps.
<span>
Well, since I had a look on the first words in the first sentence it become clear for me that the author included these sentence in order to provide a contrast to his group’s nonviolent efforts. Just because of the grammar structure of the lines, when it starts from ''The other'' we can predict that the speaker compares something with the excerpt represented above. I bet there was a previous introductory sentence that is connected with particular movement and further we can see ''the other" that reflects contrast.<span>
</span></span>
“The same little featherhead!”, “That is like a woman!”, “What is this! Is my little squirrel out of temper?”
The are the three best options that show Torvald sometimes treats Nora like a child. Calling Nora a "little featherhead" and "little squirrel out of temper" gives her appearance of a person who is not very wise or intelligent. It makes her seem innocent and ignorant much like a child would be. When Torvald says, "That is like a woman!", it is not just a statement of fact. Torvald sees women as innocent, ignorant and helpless much like a child would be. The other two options do not fit because that do not show that Torvald thinks of Nora as a child.
1) “mind if - if I..”
2) “I - I don’t..”
3) marathon - she really did!
4) “There - There’s a ghost..”
5) North pole alone - what a brave man!
6) final encore - what a performance!
7) “What - What was I..”
8) boat damaged - what bad luck!
9) On Monday night - or was it Tuesday - we went to the opera.
10) forgetting something - what is it?
