3 years ago

Which statement could be proved false using a counterexample?

Mathematics

1 answer:

vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago

4 0

All acute angles are 30 degrees.

You might be interested in

Congratulations! You just landed your dream job. You have three choices for your salary. Which of the following options would re

il63 [147K]

Answer:

(b)

Step-by-step explanation:

a=1,500,000

b=3,050,000

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Classify the triangle by it's angels and sides. Explain how you knew which classifications to use. 8, 70 degrees, 11, 45 degrees

anzhelika [568]

The angles degrees are all less than 90 degrees. Therefore the triangle is an acute triangle

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following system of linear inequalities is represented by the solution graphed below

12345 [234]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The wanted region(shaded part)..is greater or equal to 2 due to the bold line...so hence the first inequality is....y is greater than or equal to 2

And the second solution....is y is less than x because of the continuous broken line...hence it cant be less than or equal to

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Answer true and false please<br> thanks

Aleksandr [31]

Option a is true and others are false

6 0

3 years ago

The area of a rectangle is 27 m^2 , and the length of the rectangle is 3 m less than twice the width. Find the dimensions of the

vagabundo [1.1K]

Let $L$ be the length of the rectangle and $W$ be the width. In the problem it is given that $L=2W-3$ . It is also given that the area $LW=27$ . Substituting in the length in terms of width, we have $W(2W-3)=27 \\ 2W^2-3W-27=0 \\ (2W-9)(W+3)=0$ . Using the zero product property, $2W-9=0 \text{ or } W+3=0$ . Solving these we get the width $W=4.5 \text{ or } -3$ . However, it doesn't make sense for the width to be negative, so the width must be $\boxed{4.5 \text{ m}}$ . From that we can tell the length $L=2(4.5)-3=\boxed{6 \text{ m}}$ .

3 0

3 years ago