All categories

3 years ago

NEED ANSWERS ASAP PLEASE

Mathematics

2 answers:

WITCHER [35]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

the first one is 4 and 5

Step-by-step explanation:

the second one is 45 because 15+15+15 is 45, you get 15 by the square root of 225

fredd [130]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

1)4)5

2)45

Step-by-step explanation:

1) ✓22 = 4.69041575 which is between 4 and 5

2) The area is 225ft2 area= length * length (the only one that fits here with 225 is 15) 15*15 is 225. Now that we know the sides for perimeter:

_15__

15 |. |. 15

-------

The question though, asks for the perimeter which is around. So you add 15 three times for the three sides and get 45ft

You might be interested in

Which table represents a function?

yawa3891 [41]

B represents a function ✔️

7 0

3 years ago

SOMEONE PELASE HELP ME ASAP! I REALLY NEED HELP ASAP

Stells [14]

Answer: below in picture

explanation: also in picture

6 0

3 years ago

Ben drove 230 kilometers in 3 hours, and Pia drove 250

Drupady [299]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Pia drove faster

Step-by-step explanation:

Speed is the ratio of distance to time. If the time is the same, the greater distance is associated with the greater speed.

Pia drove farther in 3 hours, so drove faster.

3 0

3 years ago

A genetic experiment involving peas yielded one sample of offspring consisting of 420 green peas and 174 yellow peas. Use a 0.01

slavikrds [6]

Answer:

a) $z=\frac{0.293 -0.23}{\sqrt{\frac{0.23(1-0.23)}{594}}}=3.649$

b) For this case we need to find a critical value that accumulates $\alpha/2$ of the area on each tail, we know that $\alpha=0.01$ , so then $\alpha/2 =0.005$ , using the normal standard table or excel we see that:

$z_{crit}= \pm 2.58$

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=420+174=594 represent the random sample taken

X=174 represent the number of yellow peas

$\hat p=\frac{174}{594}=0.293$ estimated proportion of yellow peas

$p_o=0.23$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.01$ represent the significance level

Confidence=99% or 0.99

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of yellow peas is 0.23:

Null hypothesis: $p=0.23$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.23$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.293 -0.23}{\sqrt{\frac{0.23(1-0.23)}{594}}}=3.649$

Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(z>3.649)=0.00026$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

b) Critical value

For this case we need to find a critical value that accumulates $\alpha/2$ of the area on each tail, we know that $\alpha=0.01$ , so then $\alpha/2 =0.005$ , using the normal standard table or excel we see that:

$z_{crit}= \pm 2.58$

Since the calculated value is higher than the critical value we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1% of significance.

5 0

3 years ago

I ain’t good at this when I use decimals

irinina [24]

The variable p is equal to 33.

5 0

3 years ago