Answer: A. Stare decisis
Explanation: Stare decisis simply means aligning with precedence. Stare decisis is a legal culture which necessitates the court to look into preceeding cases when making rulings on similar cases. It obligates the court that when making ruling on a certain cases, rulings preceeding cases of similar nature, fact and structure must be considered.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the court is following legal precedent set by the ruling of a previous case in other to make decision on a current case. Therefore, the second case is an example of stare decisis.
Answer: World Relief Fund - Food saving
Explanation:
World Relief is a humanitarian organization and for its fund, food saving is very important. This organization is requiring love, action, and help.
Refugee Resettlement Program is one of the programs that this humanitarian organization has and in this program people are helping and trying to get food and clean water for people. Food is very important for people that don't have proper resources. It is important because of the health, good life, nutrition, child development. This organization is in partnership with some of the communities and churches and they are really helpful.
Food saving for those people is important because of world peace, health, and care.
Checks and balances exist to keep a single branch of government from becoming too powerful. This is true for all governments that use this system.
.Answer:Rejected
Explanation:
Rejection is an act of non-acceptance by some social group or by a person. It is associated with the feeling of pain in the brain and depends upon how deeper the root of rejection.
Rejection can be experienced in different aspects of everyday life. While rejection is part of life, sometimes it becomes difficult to cope with.
Here also Gavin feels rejected because many classmates list him as one of the least-liked children. It may cause social anxiety, Fear and avoidant personality
If elected to an executive position: would choose a fully technical team with ministers or secretaries who actually had expertise in their respective portfolios. People I had confidence in who could actually show results in different areas of government action. It would broaden the channels of popular participation, involve the population in government decisions. I would establish a management plan with goals to address the main issues of the place I was governing. And I would be very careful about the alliances I would make. I would not make alliances with the corrupt no matter what it cost. My biggest goal would be to finish the term with nothing to be ashamed of and very proud of.
