The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
The answer is that it takes an overly sociocultural view of
the psychological disorder because the diagnostic and statistical manual of
mental disorder helps professionals to be able to know the psychological
disorder in which is one way of having to gain its sociocultural overview in
regards with the disorders.
I believe the answer is: D.<span>The people elect representatives, who govern according to the people’s wishes.
Under popular sovereignity, the citizens do not have the power to directly vote for the type of legislation that they desired (in contrast to direct democracy).
But, the citizens could appoint the representative who had similar view and principle with them and give their trust to that representative to make the legislation that would benefit them.</span>
<span> it meant a supposedly historic Supreme Court decision had little to no effect in terms of actual lived experience.
The phrase indicates that the government who at that time was expected to formulae the correct decision in handling racial-related problems was being really vague on where they stand on the matter.</span>
