1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olin [163]
3 years ago
8

How is the style of "Gumption" different from that of "To Build a Fire"? The style of "Gumption" is developed through realistic

dialogue, while the style of "To Build A Fire" is objective. The style of "Gumption" is developed through personification, while the style of "To Build A Fire" is overly informal. The style of "Gumption" is overly formal, while the style of "To Build A Fire" is loose and humorous. The style of "Gumption" is objective, while the style of "To Build A Fire" is biased.
History
1 answer:
bezimeni [28]3 years ago
8 0
The style of "Gumption" is different from that of "To Build a Fire" by <span>The style of "Gumption" is developed through personification, while the style of "To Build A Fire" is overly informal.</span>
You might be interested in
Why do u think so many Indians disproved of British rule in India in the late nineteen . ​
Dima020 [189]

<u>Answer</u>:

There were many harmful rules and strategies followed and people were harmed badly.

Thats why so many Indians disproved of British rule in India in the late nineteen.

​

<u>Explanation</u>:

During the late nineteenth century, people disproved the britishers in India. This was because of many violations and harmness caused by them. They started hating them badly. People even felt that is not correct to come to their home land and start conquering and ruling them.

Unfair policies were implemented and indians were treated as slaves of their own country. They hated this descrimination. They were asked to say that only britishers are superior were Indians are not. Their freedom and rights are being pulled off and it is not correct to disrespect people.

5 0
3 years ago
Help me please I need this done by thursday!!!
Lilit [14]

Answer:

I am not sure I'm very sorry I wish you best of luck

Explanation:

I hope you get it done by Thursday

8 0
2 years ago
What do the governments of Mexico and Denmark have in common?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

The United States of Mexico is a federal presidential republic. The Constitution of 1917 is in force with numerous amendments. Executive power belongs to the president, who is the head of state and government. The President forms the cabinet, appoints and removes ministers, the Attorney General (with the approval of the Senate), members of the Supreme Court (with the approval of the Senate) and other senior public servants. The President determines domestic and foreign policy, has legislative initiative and veto power, establishes diplomatic relations and concludes international treaties. The president is elected by the people on the basis of universal, direct, secret ballot, without the right to re-election. Legislative power belongs to the bicameral National Congress. The principles of public administration in accordance with the 1917 Constitution meet the criteria for representative liberal democracy.

Denmark is a constitutional monarchy. The constitution was adopted in 1849; amendments were made in 1915 and 1953, when a unicameral parliament was created and women were allowed to become head of state. The head of state is the king, who exercises legislative power together with a unicameral parliament. The highest legislative body is Folketing. Executive power belongs to the monarch and is carried out on his behalf by the government. The government is appointed by the Prime Minister, approved by Folketing and is accountable to him.

Thus, the similarity is the fact that in Mexico the president and in Denmark the king determine domestic and foreign policy. However, the difference is obvious, primarily consisting in the very form of government - the republic and the monarchy, respectively, with all the further differences that follow from this.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How did the Indians view Columbus according to his account ?
Verdich [7]
They were very friendly and giving towards him. Trying to give him various things such as parrots, balls of cotton, and spears. Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Crispus Attucks significant to the
lapo4ka [179]
He was one of the people killed in the Boston Massacre
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the primary goal of the D-Day invasion at Normandy?
    5·2 answers
  • “she was dark and thin and foreign-looking in a world where prestige went to blondness and curly hair and dimples, slow where gl
    13·1 answer
  • What is the highest and lowest local governments
    13·1 answer
  • The right answer will get brainiest
    7·1 answer
  • According to Lenin, which person was the most capable to take over as leader?
    14·1 answer
  • What did the average child in the Indus River Valley do every day?​
    14·2 answers
  • All of the following are words that the Navajo used for technical terms for military artillery/people, EXCEPT for which one?
    8·2 answers
  • How many people lived in Jamestown?
    11·2 answers
  • How did British civilians live during the First World War and how did they contribute to the War?
    8·1 answer
  • Desiderius Erasmus said in a letter to Sir Henry Guildford in 1519:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!