The Missouri Compromise was necessary because Missouri was going to become a US state, but it wasn't yet declared a free or slave state. There were already an equal number of free and slave states and congress feared the admitting Missouri as either one would upset the balance. The Missouri Compromise admitted Missouri as a slave state but said Maine would be a free state. Thomas Jefferson didn't agree with the compromise and feared it would start a conflict that would damage the Union
:)
Answer:
“The greatness of Aishara over the rest of the wives is like thareed”, i.e. the superiority that meat has over ordinary food. (The Holy Prophetsa)
Explanation:
please mark me as the brainliest answer and please follow me
Ambox current red.svg This article is outdated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (April 2016)Economy of Qatar [1]Doha skyline in the morning (12544910974).jpgDoha, financial centre of Qatar.Currency Qatari riyalTrade organisationsOPEC, WTOStatisticsGDP Increase $324.2 billion (PPP; 2015 est.)GDP rank 52GDP growthIncrease 4.7% (2015 est.)GDP per capitaIncrease $145,000 (PPP; 2015 est.)GDP by sectorAgriculture (0.1%), Industry (58.8%), Services (41.1%) (2015 est.)Inflation (CPI) 1.6% (2015 est.)Population below poverty line0%[2]Labour forceIncrease 1.64 million (2015 est.)Unemployment Steady 0.4% (2015 est.)Main industriesLNG and GTL Production, Crude Oil Production and Refining, Ammonia, Fertilizers, Petrochemicals, Steel Reinforcing Bars, Cement, Commercial Ship RepairEase-of-doing-business rank40th[3]ExternalExports Decrease $77.74 billion (2015 est.)Export goodsLiquefied Natural Gas, Petroleum Products, Fertilizers, SteelMain export partners Japan 25.3% South Korea 18.8% India 12.7% China 7.7% Singapore 6.2% United Arab Emirates 5.1% (2014 est.)[4]Imports Decrease $37.15 billion (2015 est.)Import goodsMachinery and Transport Equipment, Food, ChemicalsMain import partners United States 11.5% China 10.6% UAE 8.2% Germany 7.1% Japan 6.4% United Kingdom 5.5% Italy 4.9% Saudi Arabia 4.6% (2014 est.)[5]Gross external debt$82.05 billion (31 December 2011 est.)Public financesPublic debtNegative increase 39.9% of GDP (2015 est.)Revenues $77.22 billion (2015 est.)Expenses $68.65 billion (2015 est.)Credit ratingStandard & Poor's:[6]AA (Domestic)AA (Foreign)AA+ (T&C Assessment)Outlook: Stable[7]Moody's:[7]Aa2Outlook: StableMain data source: CIA World Fact BookAll values, unless otherwise stated, are in US dollars.
Qatar Export Treemap
Map showing the mineral resources of Qatar.Petroleum and liquefied natural gas are the cornerstones of Qatar's economy and account for more than 70% of total government revenue, more than 60% of gross domestic product, and roughly 85% of export earnings. Proved oil reserves of 15 billion barrels (588,000,000 m3) should ensure continued output at current levels for 23 years. Oil has given Qatar a per capita GDP that ranks among the highest in the world. Qatar's proved reserves of natural gas exceed 7000 km3, more than 5% of the world total and the third-largest reserves of any country in the world. Production and export of natural gas are becoming increasingly important. Long-term goals include the development of off-shore petroleum and the diversification of the economy.
Contents [hide] 1 Macro-economic trend2 Energy sector3 Industry4 Financial sector4.1 Islamic finance4.2 Capital market5 Tourism6 Transport7 See also8 References9 External links
There are examples of not only dictators using propaganda, but even weaker government officials and entire nationalities using propaganda to "get what [they] want." Propaganda is a system of information spread whose purpose is the advertisement of an ideal held by the party that made the propaganda itself. The specific purpose of propaganda ranges from getting voters for a certain cause to giving the general public similar sentiments to yourself. Propaganda is a system based not specifically on the dictator, but any person who uses media to spread their own beliefs and ideals, whether they be good or bad.
In the case of dictators, propaganda was an excellent method of spreading information that not just the literate could understand, but the entirety of the public. Especially under Joseph Stalin, leader of the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1953, the use of propaganda on the unwary and uneducated public in the form of political cartoons and radio messages allowed the Russian leader to maintain a popular standing with the public. Under the rule of Stalin, freedom and exploration of the realities of the world was limited for the general public, so the main source of information at the time, newspapers and other media, allowed the propaganda an easy way to spread falsities.
Propaganda being used by a dictator is not automatically a lie. Of course, much of the propaganda spread by dictators was fabricated, but often not entirely. Also know that countries like the Soviet Union that were--for the most part--ruled by a dictator were not the only governments to use propaganda. The USA and many other democratic countries used their fair share of propaganda, but these attempts were not as successful as ones seen by Russia at the time probably because of the reasons I listed earlier. America and other democratic countries did not have as tight of a grip on foreign and worldwide affairs, so the spread of information was not limited to newspapers and radio, thus allowing for Americans to be not as effectively affected by propaganda.
This was forming a goverment that was strong enough to gain loyalty of its citizens but not so strong as to estrange them