Answer:
P ( -1, -3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given ratio is AP : PB = 3 : 2 = m : n and points A(5,6) B(-5,-9)
We will calculate coordinates of the point P which divides line segment AB in the following way:
xp = (n · xa + m · xb) / (m+n) = (2 · 5 + 3 · (-5)) / (3+2) = (10-15) / 5 = -5/5 = -1
xp = -1
yp = (n · ya + m · yb) / (m+n) = (2 · 6 + 3 · (-9)) / (3+2) = (12-27) / 5 = -15/5 = -3
yp = -3
Point P( -1, -3)
The area and perimeter of the triangle is 2/5 square units and (2√10 + 4√5) / 5 units
<h3>Determining the perimeter and area of the triangle giving line equation</h3>
In order to determine the area and perimeter of the lines, we will plot the giving lines, determine the point of intersection and then use the Pythagoras theorem to determine the dimension of the right triangle.
The points of intersection of the line are;
(x₁, y₁) = (- 0.4, 5.2),
(x₂, y₂) = (-0.8, 4.4),
(x₃, y₃) = (0, 4)
Determine the base
b² = c² -a²
b = √(-0.8)² + (4 - 4.4)²
b = 2√5 / 5
Determine the height
h = √((- 0.4) - (- 0.8))² + (5.2 - 4.4)²
height = 2√5 / 5
For the hypotenuse
r = √2 · b
r = 2√10 / 5
<h3>Determine the Perimeter and area</h3>
Perimeter = s1+s2+s3
Perimeter = 2√5 / 5 + 2√5 / 5 + 2√10 / 5
Perimeter = (2√10 + 4√5) / 5 units
<u>For the area</u>
area = 1/2* base * height
A = 0.5 · (2√5 / 5) · (2√5 / 5)
A = 2/5 square units
Hence the area and perimeter of the triangle is 2/5 square units and (2√10 + 4√5) / 5 units
Learn more on area and perimeter of triangles here: brainly.com/question/12010318
#SPJ1
Answer:
A = 236,000 (1.04)^t
population in 2009 : 335,902 people
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, to answer this question we have to apply an exponential growth function:
A = P (1 + r) t
Where:
p = original population
r = growing rate (decimal form) = 4/100 = 0.04
t= years passed from 2000
A = population after t years
Replacing with the values given:
A = 236,000 (1+ 0.04)^t
A = 236,000 (1.04)^t
Population in 2009.
t = 2009-2000 = 9
A = 236,000 (1.04)^9
A = 335,902 people
Feel free to ask for more if needed or if you did not understand something.
Answer:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
Step-by-step explanation:
No, Lance's thinking is wrong because you cannot compare decimal numbers with alphabetizing words. For example, if we compare 37.6 to 7.42 using the method of Lance, we would probably say 37.6 is less than 7.42 because 3 is less than 7. But it is wrong. The 3 in 37.6 is in the tens place. On the other hand, 7.42 contains no tense. Therefore, 37.6 is actually higher.
