Answer:
A) Allowance of a credit for child care expenses - child care is an important part of social policy, and many experts argue that it should be free in order to promote healthy demographics and social cohesion.
C) Allowing accelerated amortization for the cost of installing pollution control facilities - this would make said pollution control facilties cheaper, and less pollution is a social concern and a social policy because it benefits society as a whole. (Pollution is the most common example of externality).
D) Allowing a Federal Income Tax deduction for state and local taxes - as long as these deductions are applied progressively, ideally, only to poor people.
These changes in strategy are indicative of internal forces of change. Internal forces of change in business refer to events, people and systems inside a company that aid or prevent it from fulfilling short term as well as long term goals.
<u>TC</u> Units
$64,500 (High) 2,470
} $30,700 } 2000
$33,800( Low) 470
<u>VC</u><u> </u><u>per</u><u> </u><u>Unit</u><u> </u><u>=</u><u> </u><u> </u> 30 700 ÷ 2000 = $15.35
when 470 units are sold,( substitute vc per unit = 15.35)
TC = FC + VC
33, 800 = FC + ( 15.35× 470)
FC = $ 26 586
Answer:
b. 300,000 shares being sold is an issuer transaction and the 200,000 shares being sold is a non-issuer transaction.
Explanation:
A non-issuer transaction is a transaction that does not directly benefit an issuer or it was not directly executed to benefit an issuer.
According to the Uniform State Law, an entity involved in the sales of certificates of interest, leases, mining titles among others is officially exempted from being labelled as an issuer. Hence, the entity (officers of the firm) in the question are non-issuer brokers.
Specifically, when the sales of stock are carried out by someone or an individual who is not a registered stockbroker, that individual officially becomes what is called 'a non-issuer broker-dealer'. The implication is that such a transaction is to be exempted from the registration requirements of the Security Exchange Commission.
In this question, since the issuer newly issued 300,000 shares while the remaining 200,000 in the proposed combination was offered by Officers of the firm - non-issuer broker-dealers. The Law states that it must be separated to show that 300,000 shares are sold in an issuer transaction (Primary) directly involving an official issuer while 200,000 shares are sold in a non-issuer transaction (Secondary).
Answer:
Present value = FV / (1 + r)^t
1. PV = $19,415 / (1 + 0.07)^15
PV = $19,415 / (1.07)^15
PV = $19,415 / 2.759031
PV = $7,036.89
2. PV = $47,382 / (1 + 0.11)^8
PV = $47,382 / (1.11)^8
PV = $47,382 / 2.3045378
PV = $20,560.31
3. PV = $312,176 / (1 + 0.10)^13
PV = $312,176 / (1.10)^13
PV = $312,176 / 3.4522712
PV = $90,426.27
4. PV = $629,381 / (1 + 0.13)^25
PV = $629,381 / (1.13)^25
PV = $629,381 / 21.230542
PV = $29,645.07
