1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alik [6]
3 years ago
12

The official language of the Ottoman Empire as set by the Young Turks was _____. Arabic Iranian Sanskrit Turkish

History
2 answers:
Zanzabum3 years ago
7 0
Turkish would be the correct answer.
WITCHER [35]3 years ago
5 0
Turkish. hope that helped
You might be interested in
The secondary causes of the extermination of the buffalo may be catalogued as follows:
Artist 52 [7]

provision of federal conservarion legoslation will help protect the buffalos

7 0
3 years ago
The main purpose behind the Bill of Rights was to protect freedoms.<br><br> True <br> False
sergejj [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

True i think

7 0
3 years ago
What four things should you look for when analyzing sources in history?
skad [1K]

When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources--whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies--that people from that period left behind.

Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.

In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?

2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the author's message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?

3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?

4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?

5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one person's eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?

6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the author's choice of words tell you? What about the silences--what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

1. Is it prescriptive--telling you what people thought should happen--or descriptive--telling you what people thought did happen?

2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?

3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of "ordinary" people? From whose perspective?

4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?

5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?

6. If we have read other historians' interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldn't want you to.



hope it helps

7 0
3 years ago
How did early Americans sometimes explain what they didnt understand
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

The Native Americans believed in gods of  everything.

Explanation:

Such as God of crops. God of battle. God of health. Sorry if I am wrong!

3 0
3 years ago
Which steps did Carnegie take to try to improve society, check all the answers that are correct
Blababa [14]
I don't understand the question fully please explain?
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the result of the civil war shape the relationship between religions in the United States????
    6·1 answer
  • Complete the statement below President Andrew Johnson initially agreed with the ...
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Second Charter of Virginia provide to the colonists?
    11·1 answer
  • How do people make the goverment work​
    11·2 answers
  • Which group of countries became soviet satellites after world war 2
    15·1 answer
  • The United States supported a system that allowed American business owners to fund, build, and profit from factories in the nati
    14·2 answers
  • A critical essay on the 2020 presidential election
    6·1 answer
  • Which factor would most likely cause the demand for a company's product to decrease?
    15·1 answer
  • La grandeza de Roma o la libertad frente a la paz en Maquiavelo
    15·1 answer
  • Which groups were already in the West? What is happening to them?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!