There are many different forms of competition that take place among various types of health care organizations some of them are the prices of services and different co-pays.
There are many ways of competition among health care organizations. A number of them are the fees of services, one-of-a-kind co-pays a person will pay out of pocket, decrease premiums, they ought to be aggressive within the best of the service in which they carry out day by day. The fitness care opposition is being marketed each day. The competitive nature of the business purposes them to attain out to the network.
Competition in health care organizations benefits clients as it enables contain fees, enhances pleasant, and encourages innovation. The Federal change fee's task as a law enforcer is to stop corporations from undertaking anticompetitive conduct that harms customers.
To higher recognize the nature of competition in health care, Zwanziger and Melnick (1996) proposed a model to investigate two kinds of healthcare market competition: opposition in physician-dominated markets (i.e. quality or non-price competition) and opposition in insurer-ruled marks (i.e. price competition).
Learn more about organizations here brainly.com/question/1288780
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. Behaviours that are rewarded recur more often.
Explanation:
According to the Law of Effect, how do rewards impact behavior? Behaviors that are rewarded recur more often.
Answer:
Explanation:
the answer i both a and b
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Thats true these people are just starting to collect social security
