Answer:
Reinforcing occurrences of generalization
Explanation:
Generalization occurs in a different context. According to the question when psychologists teaching women with intellectual disabilities about to clean her department.
Even the session for the clinical department was put in the department. The session was taken by the psychologist. When women do the cleaning of her department psychologists used reinforcement techniques to encourage women, so she can do the cleaning of the department.
So that to promote generalization by psychologists used a technique named reinforcing occurrences of generalization.
I am going to have to say D, <em>A communist dictatorship was established in Russia after the Revolution, </em><em />is the answer because the US was determined to spread democracy throughout the world and when Russia became communist that put a strain on relationships between the USA and Russia. The US in a round about way boycotted Communist countries.
Hopefully this helps.
<u>Nelson Mandela was a South African leader who was tried for treason by the white South African government. he and seven other leader were sentenced to life imprisonment in 1964, for during to oppose the apartheid regime in his country. He spent the next 28years in Robben Island, South Africans most dreaded prison</u>
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The statement which is true about the Russian Constitution is that it gives its people freedom to speech.
In Article 29 of the Russian Constitution, states the the citizen of Russia shall be guaranteed the freedom of ideas and speech. The freedom of expression and speech is the slowly eroding freedom guaranteed by the Russian constitution.
Therefore, option B is correct.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
