Answer:
characters are all completely different and not all horror deals with monsters
subject rejected because its not the clearest approach hope this helps
Explanation:
The rhetorical device which James Baldwin most clearly uses in this passage is B. Figurative language
<h3>What is Personification?</h3>
This refers to the figure of speech that gives human attributes to inanimate objects.
Hence, we can see that the rhetorical device being used by James Baldwin as he talked about the frozen blood thawing at the hearing of a particular sound is most likely personification because it gives the actions of the blood which is an inanimate object, human qualities.
Read more about personification here:
brainly.com/question/1013597
#SPJ1
<span>If I understand you correctly, you are talking about the fourth act of play by George Bernard Shaw. In that case, even though you didn’t attach the options to give you the right answer, I have the correct one. I am pretty sure that the most likely reason Liza is making such a big deal about finding out what is properly hers is that she is making it clear that she intends to reclaim her independence. Do hope you still need it because it will definitely help you.</span>
Answer: Limit each paragraph to one main idea. (Don't try to talk about more than one idea per paragraph.)
Prove your points continually by using specific examples and quotations from your note cards.
Use transition words to ensure a smooth flow of ideas from paragraph to paragraph.
Explanation:
Limit each paragraph to one main idea. (Don't try to talk about more than one idea per paragraph.)
Prove your points continually by using specific examples and quotations from your note cards.
Use transition words to ensure a smooth flow of ideas from paragraph to paragraph.
This exposition impractically catches the pith of New York City much superior to anything I will ever have the capacity to. As a Californian, I view New York as I envision a New Yorker in the Nineteenth Century would view California. The contemplation is practically outlandish. California is the boundlessness edged pool of a landmass. Its wide open meanders perpetually, forever of the open doors which it holds until the land drops into nothingness and the Pacific devours it.
New York then again, shouldn't exist. Many think of it as the zenith of human accomplishment, a mixture of humankind existing together with an enthusiastic feeling of a club, all living under the standard held high that drains, "New York." It is where ten million drums play to their own beat, yet all ring to a similar congruity.
Didion's involvement in the city echoes these tones. The city is undoubtedly a spot where a half year can transform into eight years, and a night out can transform into a marriage. Didion expressed, "It was an unendingly sentimental idea, the puzzling nexus of all affection and cash and power, the sparkling and short-lived dream itself."
This exposition goes about as Didion's adoration letter to the city, one that isn't composed starting with one captivated sweetheart then onto the next, yet rather as Socrates would keep in touch with Zeus in an incredible miracle of his god-like power. Didion sees New York as legendary Fate, culling and cutting the strings of life which would decide her way of presence. Didion drives home the thought that New York is a thought. It represents something. New York is synonymous with America.
Opportunity. Renewed opportunities. Acts of futility. It is the New Mesopotamia, the support of life held in its bin by the two streams which give it its separated liveliness. American contemporary articles endeavor to restore the sentimental nature which used to drive American writers like Whitman and Thoreau to compose, and she completes a magnificent activity of that. My inquiry is how does Didion's association with the city influence her life?
