1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lukranit [14]
3 years ago
8

In the early and mid-1800s, the majority of the Southern economy depended on

History
1 answer:
Bond [772]3 years ago
3 0
Farming/ slavery. 
This answer really depends on what the question is asking, the southern economy banked heavily off of farming, BUT it was impossible to provide and have such an abundance of crops without slavery. So, it depends on the options you have.
Hope this helps, man!
You might be interested in
What contributions did Cortes make to spanish exploration and conquest ?
Dominik [7]
What contributions did<span> Francisco Pizarro </span>make<span> to later </span>Spanish exploration and conquest<span>? He kidnapped the Inca emperor, which led to the empire's downfall. What impact </span>did<span> later </span>Spanish exploration and conquest<span> have on the people of Europe?</span>Spain<span> rapidly expanded foreign trade and overseas colonization</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Pls bless me :(
irinina [24]

Answer:

he envisioned a better future, founded upon four freedoms: the "four essential human freedoms," some traditional and some new ones. The four freedoms he outlined were freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
1.) What was unique about Nazi deportations of Jews in Denmark when compared to other countries that the Nazis conquered?
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

It is difficult to begin a chronological index, a matrix – as it were – for a massive event. In fact, Nazi Germany generated several policies of planned mass killing, a practice which culminated in the attempt to completely destroy European Jewry in a planned way, which will be the focal point of this index. The beginning of these mass killing practices has been clearly identified: the first massacres took place in the context of the total ideological war against the USSR. However, the warning signs preceding these practices, without which the latter remain mostly difficult to understand, are still being discussed (Burrin, 1989; Gerlach, 1998; Browning, 1992 and 2003; Brayard, 2004). With a few rare exceptions, the factual information about these phenomena has been well documented and analyzed, which justifies attributing four stars to all of the facts and events detailed below, except when indicated otherwise.

Should one link Hitler directly to Luther, as some U.S. authors did in the 1950s? The approach chosen here will not. The first manifestations of discrimination against Jews began in Germany during the First World War, then were eclipsed on the institutional level during the Weimar Republic; afterward, they grew steadily from 1933 to 1941. However, one cannot trace a direct line from discrimination to persecution and killing.

Thus, we must begin by focusing on Germany, even though murder practices (in the strictest sense) did not take place there at the time, in order to explain a process which blazed across the whole of Europe and led to the participation of a very broad part of European societies, and the killing of over 5 million Jews from all the countries involved (Hilberg, 1961). We shall also present a detailed account of the local implementation procedures of violent impulses, which were sometimes decided locally, but were more frequently inspired by the Berlin-based decision-making centers, through a general matrix, and four geographically-based indexes. Based on the general matrix, which will concentrate on the central (i.e., German) point of view, we shall:

show how discrimination practices were exported, radicalized and spread to the fringe of territories that were occupied early on – Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland. Actually, these countries initially served as laboratories for Nazi Germany’s Final Solution, and then – in the case of Poland – as a vanguard in this process.

Observe how killing practices began differently, and followed specific procedures in Yugoslavia, and especially in Russia.

Describe how the Nazis implemented the decision to eradicate European Jewry, which had been taken between December 1941 and the end of January 1942, and adapted it to particular local conditions in Western Europe.

May 1916: Census of the Jews drafted into the German armed forces, officially to put an end to rumors that they were not sent to the Front as much as other troops. The census results were not publicized; this added to the rumors, which grew after 1918 (Kruse, 1997).

1918-1924: At the end of the war, Germany experienced a series of different kinds of unrest and conflict: friction in its border areas due to inter-community clashes in Silesia and in the Posen area, several coup attempts, revolutionary movements and the Spartakist crisis in Berlin, Max Hoelz’s Communist insurrection in Thuringia and Saxony (Schumann, 2001), as well as Kapp’s separatist coup in Bavaria. Germans experienced the occupation of the Rhineland and the Ruhr region by Franco-Belgian forces as the peak of the crisis, as this occupation was perceived as an invasion, coupled with an internal betrayal, due to the activitives of the Rhinelander separatists (Krumeich, Schröder (eds.), 2004). The idea of a “World of enemies” in league with one another against Germany, which had emerged during World War I, came back to the fore at this time. The imagined conjunction of the action of internal and external enemies, some of which were seen as marked by a biological difference, constitutes a mental structure born of war culture, and of its preservation as a framework of thought by völkische activists throughout this period.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
2. How might you approach military history in a more constructive manner?
avanturin [10]

Answer:

See the explanation below.

Explanation:

According to me, if we use Military history to learn about leadership and study the commander's mind then it will be the more constructive approach towards the subject. We can keep our focus on military affairs which have large impact on our society.

Military history as a discipline record the armed conflict in the history of humanity and tries to assess it's impact over economies, societies, culture, etc. which in result lead to changes or development in local and international affairs. It also help us to study about military strategy adopted by each side and help in assessing how these tactics and technologies have changed with time, for example, it tries to explain that how warfare led to the development of weapon and with time how emerging technologies have shaped these weapons.

3 0
3 years ago
Which religion do followers read from the Torah?
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

Judaisam

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following occurred first in history?
    6·2 answers
  • Where was Carthage located, and why did it compete with Rome
    5·1 answer
  • If u are smart at history plz help me. thx
    15·2 answers
  • 1 which mineral above would be the most difficult to scratch
    15·1 answer
  • What extent did the idea of the enlightenment influence the politics of eighteenthcetury erope
    10·1 answer
  • In a patent case being heard for the first time, this is an example of
    12·2 answers
  • Where did large cities form
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the Battle of the Alamo significant? *
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the positive and negative implications of the United States staying neutral
    15·1 answer
  • Because of weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, the government of the United States was unable to
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!