They where hunter-gatherers
The answer is Peru, i believe. Please correct me if i am wrong
The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
C. values.....................................................
Answer:
Statement is true.
Explanation:
In simple words Pluralism is defined as the system or condition under which two or more groups, principles, states, etc., coexist. Under the concept there exist a doctrine of multiplicity and there is no dominant set of organization present which directs the policy making processes.
Given statement is correct because it is this concept of Pluralism which provide an individual or interest group an effective way to participate in the political system and allowing theirs view and ideas to be heard in an organised manner. According to pluralist, negotiation and discussion among these interest groups further provide a balance of power which also protects an individual from inclining towards any specific ideology or view point and helps them to remain neutral.
Hope this will help.
