I absolutely agree with the idea that school cafeterias should be required to provide vegetarian or vegan lunch options.
The reason for this is that not all people are non-vegetarian and therefore they may be needing those food options. Also, they cannot be hungry for an entire day, so its best to give them variable options.
Also, even if everybody is non-vegetarian, it won't harm to keep the vegan food in the menu, because may have their moods and may want to eat something light and healthy. The vegetarian food may serve the purpose. And it's always good to have a lot of variety in food options so that kids can freely choose.
To learn more about vegan food, click
brainly.com/question/16847078
#SPJ4
People often have their opinions been challenged several times. A time when I were challenged by a perspective that differed from your own was when i was in the university.
- A lecturer of mine taught us a topic and there was a statement he made that was quite different from what I was taught at home. This is because the topic he was teaching was familiar to me. I decided to raise tell Him my own perspective of what he said during the question and answer time, but he was still adamant that his own deductions were right.
- At first, I was not not happy by his response or perspective. But I have to look at it from another angle. Not Everyone may agree with you or your perspective but that does not mean you or them are wrong.
A change in perspective can result in a big a positive but it also has its own challenges when responding to one's views. Through the act of engaging in different opinions and different ideas, and shifting one's perspective along with others, one can learn.
Learn more about Perspectives from
brainly.com/question/13107415
Because the Hepburn Act strengthened existing government control of railroads.
The hepburn act gave united states federal law the right to <span>set maximum railroad rates and extend its jurisdiction. This means that the taxation expense that had to be paid by the railroad companies would be significantly higher compared to the period before hepburn Act</span>
Answer:A slave is property, bound to work as his/her owner sees fit. A slave has no legally protected rights of ownership. Some slaves in some sense ‘owned’ property, or even money, but this was always at the owner’s discretion, and legally it all belonged to the owner really.
Serfdom, on the other hand, was an implicit contractual relationship. The serf owed both labour and rent, usually in kind — serfdom is typical of an economy with little use of money. In return, the lord owed protection and justice. These were rough times, and a common labourer without a lord would not be able to prevent marauders seizing his land.
I hope I helped and plz mark me as brainlyest
I think that it's 4, i'm pretty aure
