The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
Answer:
The Aztec Empire was based in the Valley of Mexico, a wide, high elevation valley in the mountains of Central Mexico. In this wide valley, the Aztecs were unified as one people, who called themselves the Mexica. ... Additionally, lake soil is very fertile, which allowed the Aztecs to develop agriculture
Explanation:
One of the results of the increase in the older population of the united states is a future problem for the Social Security system.
<h3>What population of the United States is referred to as the older population?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the people in the society that are at the stage and the age of retirement in the nation. These people are of the age 65 and above. The social security system is done in such as way that the people would be able to receive the social security benefits.
Hence we can say that One of the results of the increase in the older population of the united states is a future problem for the Social Security system.
Read more on the social security system here: brainly.com/question/1156607
#SPJ1
Answer:
The tragedy of the commons
<h3>What is meant by the tragedy of the commons?</h3>
- The tragedy of the commons refers to a situation in which individuals with access to a public resource (also called a common) act in their own interest and, in doing so, ultimately deplete the resource.
- This economic theory was first conceptualized in 1833 by British writer William Forster Lloyd.
To learn more about it, refer
to brainly.com/question/25689052
#SPJ4
Answer:
Secularism helps promote religious tolerance, which is required to maintain peace, co-operation, and unity among people. Lack of religious tolerance brings hostility, division, and clashes. We can also have a look in our history that famous kings or any other personality in Nepal.
