The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete and does not provide any options or further references, we can say that some might see that as a problem because of the following: "All states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won."
To understand this answer we have to include the following idea. The scenario described in this question is a supposed presidential election organized in 2028. There are two candidates. Democratic Senator Rosa Marcus and Republican candidate Ted Torres. Marcus was declared victorious after having 5 more Electoral votes than Torres. With those 5 more votes, candidate Marcus reaches the 270 votes needed for the Electoral College could get a winner in the election. So with that context, the kind of adjustment needed in the Electoral College to change a situation like this would be that all states splitting their electoral votes between the candidates based on what percentage of the popular vote they won.
Answer:
During the Vietnam War the U.S military used the television and photographs as propaganda in order to persuade the people that the war was nothing but a war and the military needed public support to get through it.
This would be false. His letter basically is about nonviolent resistance. It doesn't really have anything to do with President Kennedy, and it's talking about unjust laws, and to take direct action instead of using violence.
I hope this helps! ~Mia
Answer:
:)
Explanation:
He meant that there was a limit of land Spain had the ability it could control, rather than the amount it could actually be successful controlling, instead of it falling apart.