Answer:
b. Restrict first amendment rights.
Explanation:
The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.
The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the <em>"clear and present danger" </em>that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
He responded by not helping because he didn’t want to fight a war across an ocean
Answer:
B. It created intense rivalries and competition for colonies.
Explanation:
Such rivalries and competition for colonies were reflected in the Berlin Conference in 1885, which was also coloquially known as "The Division of Africa", the construction of alliances (Central States, Entente Cordiale) that ignited World War I.
Answer:
Industrial Revolution which takes it as the product of shifts in both supply and ... development of capitalism in Russia.3 And Section III briefly illustrates how ... the effect of directing attention to consumption through the market is to rewrite history.
Explanation:
Capitalism caused the Industrial Revolution because industrialization required significant work and investment from individuals and not necessarily the government.
Answer:
Antisemitism/antisemite
Explanation:
Antisemitism is hostility in general towards anyone who worships and follows the religion of judaism.
Someone who believes in antisemitism is called an "antisemite"