The action of the speaker that can be considered ironic is that actually the speaker takes initiative of establishing the wall up to himself but then he questions it and has some doubts about that. There is another irony, I would say, the main one, you may find it useful : the wall which was meant to separate neighbours brings them together every year in order to repair it. Is it really the borderline?Hope that helps.
Answer:
has is the answer pls any help
There are a lot of answers to this question depending on
the given choices to choose from. So next time please be kind enough to include
the choices. I can give you three possible answers for this question, now it
all depends on you to choose which one of these three are in the choices:
Select 1:
1. Readers are forced to consider the possible monstrous
actions inside of themselves, like hatred or prejudice.
2. The monster challenges readers to recognize that a
monster could be an ordinary person, not just an outcast.
3. Readers must consider that monsters live among them, maybe
in their own town.
We can actually see that the commonality in the three
choices tells us that the monster does not really refer to the monsters
depicted in fiction. However, monsters could be just ordinary person, it could
even perhaps refer to us. What makes us a monster is our personality, not our
appearance.
<span> </span>
The author uses first person perspective to help create suspense in this passage.
Having the author experience the events along with the narrator creates a sense of calm and happiness at first, lulling the narrator (and the reader) into a sense of comfort. Then, seeing the surprise and the horror of her older face the narrator and the reader discover it together and the mood shifts instantly.
