Question: The Founders of the United States gave much consideration to the division of responsibility between federal and state governments. They strove to strike a balance between an overbearing central government (such as the British government that had ruled them before the Revolution) and an over reliance on local governments (such as the structure of US government under the Articles of Confederation). Many citizens today continue to debate the correct balance between federal and state government.
What is your position? Name some areas of conflict where you think the powers are improperly balanced. Name some areas where you think the balance works well.
Explanation:
When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so. Both of these situations can be good or bad.
For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense. At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.
The question provides no options to choose from, I came across the question previously and here are the options:
<span>a. a smaller share of people living
in urban places
b. the expansion of personal choice
c. increasing social diversity
d. a future orientation and growing awareness of time</span>
The answer
is “A”, “a smaller
share of people living in urban places”.
Peter Ludwig Berger<span> was an Austrian American and
Protestant scholar. Berger is ostensibly best known for his book, co-wrote with
Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A
Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge<span> , which is viewed as a standout among the most compelling writings in
the human science of learning and assumed a focal part in the advancement of
social constructionism. </span></span>
People who know him say that he is egosyntonic.
When it comes to egosyntonic character, it refers to people who manage to stay calm and collected in any situation. In this case, Jamal remains the same no matter what the situation may be, which is why he was given the promotion because of his level-headedness and the ability to stay cool at all times.
Answer: Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi would describe these moments for Charlene as her undergoing the "Psychological Process of Flow"
Explanation: Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi is a psycologist from Hungary that identified and formed the Concept of Flow also referred to as being "in the zone"
According to the concept, a person carrying out an activity becomes fully engrossed and focused in that activity that he or she begins to enjoy it and gain fulfillment from it.
The activity referred to here is usually one with a set goal and feedback on the person's performance.
Here, the Flow Concept describes Charlene feeling because;
1. She has a set goal (training for Iron Man triathlon) and
2. She most likely has gotten feedback for her performance (because it's physical exercise, the results on her body would be visible).
So, Charlene's practice exercise for her triathlon has become fun and not just work because she has began to enjoy it and find fulfillment from it.
Belgium is located between German and France
