Answer:
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses – often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the day.
and for the poor
,
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a servant or slave. Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and who they would marry.
Explanation:
I believer that it is A. However Muslims believe that (like in the Christian bibile) there were many prophets before Mohammed however he was the chosen on and wrote down his spiritual hearings and lead the charge after breaking away for Christianity. Don't forget, both religions share similar (sometimes near identical) creation stores and other tales and both . Don't forget Mohammad is in the christian bible and Jesus is in the Koran, both versions of Jesus are near identical until it comes to the Cross and Res-erection.
Answer:
I think the answer is D.
Explanation:
This seems to make sense because they would most likely want to keep it there but not get it wanting the food. A-C would probably make it mad and they typically leave people alone if they aren't antagonized.
Answer:
i think the answer is logic i hope this helps
Explanation:
The correct answer is 1
The concept of anomie was, in Sociology, coined by Émile Durkheim in the works "Da Social Division of Labor" (1893) and "Suic***" (1897) and later used in the work "Moral Education" (1902), where he addressed the role of morality in the fight against the anomic state. For this sociologist, anomie is a social situation produced by the weakening of social bonds and by the loss of society's ability to regulate the behavior of individuals, generating, for example, social phenomena such as s**c***. It is an absence of a “body of social norms” capable of regulating social interaction marked by “solidarity”.
For Durkheim, anomie is a temporary stage, the product of rapid social changes, loss of faith (in its broadest sense) and traditions. This stage, for him, is surpassed from the moment that interest groups determine new rules in order to regulate what is “maladjusted” in society.
