Answer:
Judicial activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is a situation whereby Judges may interpret the Constitution to their taste, adapting it to modern situations: award rights, make other branches take action, Prescribing rather than proscribe.it is based on the philosophy of judicial decision-making as judges allow, mainly, their personal views about public policy to guide and help in their decisions making or taking. In it, the flexibility of the Constitution is inadequate.
In this philosophy, Court can go beyond the words of the Constitution e.g judge can use his own personal intuition or views or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
The Connecticut Compromise was an agreement that both large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The compromise defined, in part, the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution.
One power granted to the federal government is the ability to declare war
<span>The correct answers is a group.
<span>
A group refers to three or more people who interact with each other, work towards the same goal(s) or have mutual interests and activities. In this instance, the students in Dr.Jones's class are a group because they share a mutual interest in social reform. </span></span>
