Thomas Jefferson ranked Locke, along with Locke’s compatriot Algernon Sidney, as the most important thinkers on liberty. Locke helped inspire Thomas Paine<span>’s radical ideas about revolution. Locke fired up George Mason. From Locke, James Madison drew his most fundamental principles of liberty and government. Locke’s writings were part of </span>Benjamin Franklin’s<span> self-education, and John Adams believed that both girls and boys should learn about Locke. The French philosopher </span>Voltaire<span> called Locke “the man of the greatest wisdom. What he has not seen clearly, I despair of ever seeing.” </span>
Foley artists do not need a degree
If you're asking what dynasty, it would be The Shang Dynasty.<span>
</span>
The correct answer is answer C ("The article will be biased because the historian is using only one source about the ruler").
If a historian only took this one scroll to write a biography on its subject (the ruler), it would most likely be extremely misleading and inaccurate. There's no way of getting closer to the truth of any subject without contrasting a variety of opinions from different sources. What if people working for this ruler wrote it in a way that made him look good? What if it was written under pressure? What if it was a complete lie? These and many other questions should come to mind as possible ways in which relying on one source might compromise historical facts.
Hope this helps!
Because of the 1830 turning point in religion
