I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option A. When Alabama's governor refused to end the policy of segregation in public universities, he invoked states rights as a <span>common argument for separation of powers under federalism. Hope this answers the question.</span>
Answer:
In 1820, amid growing sectional tensions over the issue of slavery, the U.S. Congress passed a law that admitted Missouri to the Union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, while banning slavery from the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands located north of the 36º 30' parallel. The Missouri Compromise was a United States federal legislation that stopped northern attempts to forever prohibit slavery's expansion by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state .
Explanation:
hope this helps
A workers can act with speed....
this is true because the bureaucracy members are chosen by qualifications rather than having to be elected
New Yorkers were most angry at the quartering act because most of the soldiers were stationed in New York. Which means that where the soldiers were stationed the people living there or around would have to supply them with food, clothes, and other supplies. As the New Yorkers spoke out, their complaints were ignored making them angry about having to freely spend their money and living places with the soldiers.
