The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The existence of many and conflicting moral viewpoints means that, logically, there are no answers to moral questions but the individual has to develop their own moral concepts that are going to be applied when it decides on an ethical issue.
Ethics studies the moral acts of human beings. Morals study the decisions that stem from the conscience. So there is no logic or reasoning because every individual has its set of moral rules or standards, depending on its culture, race, ethnicity, values, or traditions. So when the individual is about to make a decision, he or she is aware that there is going to be consequences from that decision and the individual has to live by those consequences.
The answer is B because
<span> Progressives believed that the growth of industries and the growth of cities caused social problems for our society.</span>
A major reason they were disappointed with behaviorism is that only examined psychological processes that were observable.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
behaviorism?</h3>
Generally, One of the primary reasons for their dissatisfaction with behaviorism was that it focused only on observing psychological processes that were open to observation.
In conclusion, the idea is that human and animal behavior can be described in terms of conditioning, independent of any appeal to ideas or emotions and that the most effective treatment for psychiatric illnesses is the modification of pattern-based behavior.
Read more about behaviorism
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ1
Answer:
the Schelieffen Plan
Explination:
The Schelieffen Plan devised the decade before the start of the World War 1 was a failed strategy for Germany to win World War II
Abolitionists ended slavery
