Answer:
The answer is 27 hours
Explanation:
Solution
The Comparative advantage depends on production of the lower opportunity cost
The opportunity cost of a production is =maximum production of other good /maximum production of the good
Now,
The opportunity cost of hot dog bun for town A =10/4=2.5
Thus,
The opportunity cost of hot dog bun for town B=6/10=0.6
So,
The town B has a comparative advantage in hot dog buns and A in sausages
Town A will produce-only sausages and it will take the time of
time in hours =total required a quantity of the good /number of products in an hour
Now,
The time for Town A for sausages=120/10=12 hours
The time for Town B for hot dog buns=120/8=15 hours
Therefore, The total time =12+15=27 hours.
<span>Inbound marketing represents a fundamental shift in the way that organizations operate because it is marketer-centric. This is an unconventional approach of systems since the usual ones is allowing the customers to be put first or customer-centric kind of approach. This kind builds the best relationship you can offer with the customer.</span>
Answer:
$5,456
Explanation:
A relevant cost can be defined as the cost that are said to be in form of a future cash cost that is relevant and important to a particular decision.
The relevant cost:
Current market cost 880 liters × Current market $6.20 per liter
= $5,456.
Therefore the relevant cost of the 880 liters of the raw material when deciding how much to bid on the special order will be $5,456
Answer:
B) diminishing marginal utility
Explanation:
The law of Diminishing marginal utility states that utility falls as consumption increases.
The law of demand states that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded.
Because of diminishing marginal utility, consumption can be encouraged by reducing price.
As utility falls, consumers would be unwilling to buy more goods at the same price, therefore it would be reasonable to reduce price to encourage consumption.
Answer: B. No. Imposing a price control below the equilibrium price in a market causes the quantity of the good available to consumers to fall because sellers will supply a smaller quantity, thereby causing some consumers to go without food that they would have been able to buy in the absence of the price control.
Explanation:
If price controls are introduced below the equilibrium price in the market, farmers or sellers will supply less to the market because they will not be incentivized to produce more seeing as they are not making what they should be making.
This, coupled with increased demand on account of food being cheaper, will lead to shortages which would mean that those that could have been able to afford the food at the equilibrium price would not be able to access food leading to even worse food shortages.
